The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the Motorola Moto E32s and the Samsung Galaxy A04s. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the best overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04s edges out the Moto E32s thanks to its superior chipset, potentially better camera performance, and exceptional battery life. While the Moto E32s offers a clean Android experience, the A04s provides a more well-rounded package for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 13 | 2022, August 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, June 02 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.7 x 76.7 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 3.02 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Slate Gray, Misty Silver | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A047F, SM-A047F/DS, SM-A047F/DSN, SM-A047M |
| Price | About 80 EUR | € 133.89 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.52 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 114h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1614:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.3 LUFS (Below average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 145123(v9)
GeekBench: 1100 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Moto E32s
- Clean Android experience
- Sleek design
- Decent display (likely AMOLED)
- Good value for money
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially shorter battery life
- Camera performance may be limited
- Charging speed is slow
Samsung Galaxy A04s
- Excellent battery life
- More powerful chipset (Exynos 850)
- Potentially better camera
- Samsung's One UI
- Good display brightness
- Design may be less appealing to some
- LCD display (potentially less vibrant)
- Charging speed is slow
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, but the Galaxy A04s boasts a measured peak brightness of 389 nits, potentially offering better visibility in bright sunlight. The contrast ratio is similar on both, suggesting comparable color depth. The Moto E32s may have a slightly more vibrant display due to its panel type (likely AMOLED vs LCD on the A04s).
Camera Comparison
While both phones are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Galaxy A04s likely holds an advantage. Samsung typically provides better image processing and more features in its budget camera offerings. The Moto E32s's camera is adequate for basic photography, but the A04s should offer more detail and better low-light performance.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04s's Exynos 850 chipset (8nm) generally outperforms the Moto E32s's Helio G37 (12nm). Expect smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the A04s. The A04s's more efficient manufacturing process also contributes to better power management.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A04s shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours. This significantly surpasses what the Moto E32s can offer. The A04s's more efficient chipset and potentially larger battery capacity contribute to its exceptional battery life.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E32s is ideal for users prioritizing a near-stock Android experience and a slightly more modern design. The Samsung Galaxy A04s is a better choice for those seeking longer battery life, a more powerful processor for smoother multitasking, and a potentially more versatile camera system.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A04s generally offers better performance due to its more powerful Exynos 850 chipset.
❓ Is the Moto E32s's software experience better?
The Moto E32s provides a cleaner, near-stock Android experience, which some users prefer. The Galaxy A04s uses Samsung's One UI, which offers more features but can be considered less 'pure'.
