Moto E32s vs. Samsung Galaxy A04e: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Motorola Moto E32s and Samsung Galaxy A04e represent the very bottom rung of the smartphone market, competing fiercely for budget-conscious buyers. Both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at the lowest possible price, but subtle differences in their underlying hardware can significantly impact the user experience. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on performance and value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and slightly better performance, the Motorola Moto E32s emerges as the winner. Its Mediatek Helio G37 chipset, while still entry-level, offers a marginal performance advantage over the Galaxy A04e’s Helio P35, making it more suitable for everyday tasks and light multitasking.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto E32s Samsung Galaxy A04e
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, May 132022, October 21
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, June 02Available. Released 2022, November 07
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in)164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight185 g (6.53 oz)188 g (6.63 oz)
 Water repellent design-
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 11Android 12, One UI Core 4.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual-13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF Auxiliary lens
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single-5 MP, f/2.2
Triple16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)5 MP, f/2.2
Video1080p@30fpsYes
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityAccelerometer, proximity
Battery
Charging15W wired-
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsSlate Gray, Misty SilverBlack, Copper, Light Blue
Models-SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS
PriceAbout 80 EUR₹ 7,999
SAR EU-0.29 W/kg (head)     1.11 W/kg (body)

Motorola Moto E32s

  • Slightly better chipset performance (Helio G37)
  • 15W wired charging offers faster top-ups
  • Potentially smoother user experience

  • Motorola's software update support can be inconsistent
  • May have limited brand recognition compared to Samsung

Samsung Galaxy A04e

  • Strong brand recognition and trust (Samsung)
  • Wider availability of accessories and support
  • Potentially more refined software experience

  • Older and less powerful chipset (Helio P35)
  • Likely slower charging speeds
  • May feel sluggish with multitasking

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Both utilize panels with resolutions likely around 720 x 1600 pixels, typical for this price point. Detailed display specs (brightness, color gamut) are unavailable, but given the target market, expect basic IPS LCD technology. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on functional readability. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance will be limited on both devices. Detailed sensor information is missing, but it's safe to assume both feature a primary camera (likely 13MP or lower) and potentially a depth sensor or macro lens. The image processing capabilities of both phones will be basic, prioritizing speed over image quality. The 2MP macro lenses often found in this segment are largely marketing fluff and offer minimal practical benefit. Expect acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but significant noise and lack of detail in low light.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto E32s features the Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37, built on a 12nm process, paired with an octa-core CPU (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53). The Samsung Galaxy A04e uses the older Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35, also 12nm, with the same CPU configuration. While the core count and clock speeds are identical, the G37 generally offers a slight GPU performance boost, making it marginally better for light gaming and smoother UI transitions. The lack of information on RAM speed (likely LPDDR4X in both) further limits performance potential. Thermal management is unlikely to be a concern with these low-power chipsets.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is a critical factor for budget phones. While specific mAh ratings are unavailable, both devices likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Motorola Moto E32s supports 15W wired charging, which is a slight advantage over the potentially slower charging speeds of the Galaxy A04e. However, the actual charging time from 0-100% will depend on the included charger and power adapter. Real-world battery life will be heavily influenced by usage patterns, but both should comfortably last a full day with moderate use.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Moto E32s if you need a phone that feels a bit snappier for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging. The slightly more powerful chipset will translate to a smoother experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A04e if you prioritize brand recognition and a potentially wider availability of accessories, accepting a minor performance trade-off. Both phones are aimed at first-time smartphone users or those needing a very basic secondary device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Helio P35 in the Galaxy A04e struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Helio P35 can run these apps, you might experience occasional lag or slowdowns, especially when multitasking. The Moto E32s with the Helio G37 will handle these apps more smoothly, offering a more responsive experience.
❓ Is the camera on either of these phones good enough for casual social media photos?
Both phones can take acceptable photos in good lighting conditions for casual social media use. However, don't expect high levels of detail or dynamic range. Low-light performance will be limited on both devices.
❓ How long will the battery last on the Motorola Moto E32s with typical usage?
With typical usage (browsing, social media, messaging), the Motorola Moto E32s should easily last a full day on a single charge. Heavy users may need to top up the battery in the evening.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging beyond the advertised wattage?
Neither phone supports significantly faster charging protocols. While they might be compatible with some generic fast chargers, the phones themselves are limited to their advertised charging speeds (15W for the Moto E32s, likely slower for the A04e).