The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for your money. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Motorola Moto E32 and the Samsung Galaxy A04. Both promise affordability, but which one delivers the better overall experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto E32 edges out the Galaxy A04 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better display. While both are budget options, the E32 offers a more responsive experience and a cleaner software feel, making it the preferable choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 05 | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 05 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Misty Silver, Pearl Blue, Slate Grey | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E32
- Slightly better performance
- Near-stock Android experience
- Potentially better display quality
- 50MP Main Camera
- Unisoc chipset not as well-regarded as Snapdragon/Exynos
- Charging speed is relatively slow (18W)
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Larger screen size
- Samsung ecosystem integration
- Reliable brand reputation
- Slower performance
- Less responsive user interface
- Simpler camera system
Display Comparison
Both phones feature HD+ displays, but the Moto E32 is rumored to have a slightly higher peak brightness and potentially better color accuracy. The Galaxy A04 boasts a larger screen size (6.5 inches vs 6.5 inches), which might be preferable for media consumption, but the overall viewing experience is comparable.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E32 typically features a 50MP main camera, offering potentially better image quality in well-lit conditions. The Galaxy A04's camera setup is generally simpler. Both phones struggle in low-light scenarios, but the E32's larger sensor might provide a slight advantage.
Performance
The Moto E32's Unisoc T606 chipset, while not a powerhouse, generally outperforms the Galaxy A04's Helio P35. The Cortex-A75 cores in the E32 offer a noticeable boost in responsiveness for everyday tasks and light gaming. The A04's performance can feel sluggish at times.
Battery Life
Both phones offer a decent battery life, typically lasting a full day with moderate usage. The Galaxy A04 has a slightly larger battery capacity (5000mAh vs 5000mAh), but the Moto E32's more efficient chipset could result in similar real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E32 is ideal for users prioritizing a smoother performance and a near-stock Android experience. The Samsung Galaxy A04 might appeal to those deeply invested in the Samsung ecosystem or seeking a slightly larger screen, but be prepared for a less snappy performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung generally offers longer software update support than Motorola, although both are limited in the budget segment. Expect at least one major Android update on the Galaxy A04.
❓ Is the Galaxy A04 worth considering if I'm heavily invested in Samsung apps?
Yes, the Galaxy A04's integration with Samsung's ecosystem (Samsung Health, Samsung Pay, etc.) is a significant advantage for existing Samsung users.
