The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Motorola Moto E32 (India) and Samsung Galaxy F04 are two contenders vying for your attention. Both offer attractive price points, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F04 edges out the Moto E32 thanks to its slightly faster charging and potentially better software support. While both offer similar performance, the F04's 15W charging provides a noticeable advantage. Ultimately, both are solid budget choices.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 05 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 07 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, One UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iceberg Blue, Cosmic Black | Jade Purple, Opal Green |
| Models | - | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.38 W/kg (head) |
Motorola Moto E32 (India)
- Clean Android experience
- Potentially better display color accuracy
- Slightly better GPU performance
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially shorter software update support
- Performance can be sluggish with demanding tasks
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Faster 15W charging
- Potential for longer software update support
- Reliable Samsung brand
- Slightly less refined design
- Performance similar to Moto E32
- Image processing may not be as good
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent visuals for everyday use. The Moto E32 might have slightly better color accuracy due to Motorola's generally good display tuning, but the difference is minimal. Viewing angles and brightness are comparable.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E32 typically features a 50MP main camera, offering potentially more detailed photos in good lighting conditions. The Galaxy F04 likely has a similar resolution, but image processing can vary. Both phones will struggle in low-light scenarios. Front-facing camera quality is likely comparable on both devices.
Performance
The Moto E32's Helio G37 and the Galaxy F04's Helio P35 are both entry-level chipsets. Expect adequate performance for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. The G37 has a slight edge in GPU performance, potentially leading to smoother gameplay in less demanding titles. However, both will struggle with heavy multitasking or graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life under moderate usage. However, the Galaxy F04's 15W charging is a significant advantage over the Moto E32's 10W charging, allowing for faster top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E32 (India) is ideal for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and a slightly more refined design. The Samsung Galaxy F04 is a better choice for those who value faster charging and potentially longer software update support from Samsung.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both have 5000mAh batteries, offering all-day usage. However, the Galaxy F04 charges faster with 15W charging.
❓ Is the Moto E32 or Galaxy F04 better for gaming?
The Moto E32 has a slight edge in GPU performance, but both are entry-level phones and will struggle with demanding games.
