The Motorola Moto E30 and Realme C25Y represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both rely on Unisoc chipsets to deliver functionality, but subtle differences in processing power and charging capabilities create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme C25Y emerges as the slightly better choice. Its 18W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Moto E30’s sluggish 10W charging, a crucial advantage for those prioritizing convenience. While the Moto E30’s chipset is technically newer, the real-world performance difference is minimal.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 03 | 2021, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 03 | Available. Released 2021, September 30 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.1 x 75.6 x 9.1 mm (6.5 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 164.5 x 76 x 9.1 mm (6.48 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 420 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2xX.x GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T700 | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G52 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, Realme UI R |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mineral gray, Digital blue | Glacier Blue, Metal Gray |
| Models | XT2158-6 | RMX3265, RMX3268, RMX3269 |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.26 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
Motorola Moto E30
- Slightly newer Unisoc T700 chipset
- Potentially better thermal efficiency (due to newer architecture)
- Clean Android experience (typical of Motorola)
- Significantly slower 10W charging
- Likely similar camera performance to the C25Y
- Performance gains over T610 are minimal
Realme C25Y
- Faster 18W wired charging
- More convenient for quick top-ups
- Competitive pricing
- Older Unisoc T610 chipset
- Potentially less efficient processor
- Realme UI can be bloated with pre-installed apps
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Specifics like resolution and peak brightness are not provided, but we can assume they are similar – around 720p+ and adequate for indoor use. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is expected. Bezels are likely substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a budget.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, and largely unimpressive. Both manufacturers often include a high-megapixel main sensor paired with several low-resolution auxiliary lenses. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Expect decent results in good lighting conditions, but significant noise and lack of detail in low light. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and offers limited practical value. Image processing will likely prioritize saturation and sharpening to compensate for the sensor limitations.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Moto E30 features the Unisoc T700, while the Realme C25Y uses the T610. Both are octa-core CPUs with the same core configuration: 2x Cortex-A75 and 6x Cortex-A55. However, the T700 is built on a newer process node (unspecified, but likely more efficient than the T610’s 12nm). While the clock speeds are nearly identical (2.0 GHz vs 1.8 GHz on the A75 cores), the T700’s architecture *should* offer a slight edge in sustained performance and thermal management. However, given the limited RAM and storage configurations typical of these devices, the practical difference will be minimal for everyday tasks. Both will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both likely house around a 5000mAh cell, standard for this segment. The critical difference is charging speed. The Realme C25Y’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Moto E30’s 10W charging. This translates to a much faster 0-100% charge time – potentially cutting charging time in half. For users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery, the C25Y is the clear winner.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto E30 if you prioritize a slightly newer chipset architecture and are willing to accept significantly slower charging speeds. This phone suits users who primarily use their device for basic tasks and charge overnight. Buy the Realme C25Y if you value faster charging and a more convenient user experience, even if it means sacrificing the latest Unisoc silicon. This is ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T700 in the Moto E30 handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Unisoc T700 is a step up from the T610, neither chipset is designed for high-end gaming. You'll likely be limited to low graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops, even with optimized settings. These phones are better suited for casual gaming and everyday tasks.
❓ How long does it realistically take to fully charge the Realme C25Y with the 18W charger?
While 18W charging is faster, the actual charge time depends on several factors, including battery health and background app usage. Expect a full charge from 0% to 100% to take approximately 2-2.5 hours, a significant improvement over the Moto E30’s likely 4+ hour charge time.
❓ Does the Realme C25Y come with a pre-installed bloatware?
Realme devices are known to include some pre-installed apps (bloatware). While the amount varies, you can typically uninstall or disable most of these apps to free up storage space and improve performance.
❓ Is the camera on either phone good enough for social media uploads?
Yes, both phones will be adequate for casual social media uploads in good lighting conditions. However, don't expect professional-quality photos. The cameras will struggle in low light, and the 2MP macro lens is unlikely to produce impressive results.
