The Motorola Moto E30 and Nokia G100 represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Moto E30 leverages the relatively new Unisoc T700 chipset, while the Nokia G100 opts for the more established Qualcomm Snapdragon 662. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for users prioritizing performance, battery life, and overall usability.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia G100 emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones target the budget segment, the Snapdragon 662 offers a more refined and consistently smoother experience than the Unisoc T700, particularly in multitasking and sustained workloads. The 15W charging also provides a marginal, but noticeable, advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 44, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 03 | 2022, September 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 03 | Available. Released 2022, October |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.1 x 75.6 x 9.1 mm (6.5 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) | 166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.56 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 195.1 g (6.88 oz) |
| | Water repellent design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~80.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2xX.x GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T700 | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G52 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0"
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mineral gray, Digital blue | Nordic Blue |
| Models | XT2158-6 | - |
| Price | About 160 EUR | About 60 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.26 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) | - |
Motorola Moto E30
- Utilizes a newer chipset architecture (Unisoc T700)
- Potentially lower price point
- May receive software updates for a longer period (depending on Motorola's support)
- Unisoc T700 performance is less consistent than Snapdragon 662
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially less optimized software
Nokia G100
- More refined and reliable Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Faster 15W charging
- Better thermal management and sustained performance
- Older chipset architecture
- May be slightly more expensive
- Software update support may be limited
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on processing power, we can infer both likely utilize LCD panels common in this price bracket. The absence of specifications like resolution or refresh rate suggests a focus on cost reduction. Bezels are likely substantial on both, and color accuracy will be standard for budget phones. The real-world difference in display quality will likely be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera supplemented by basic auxiliary lenses (potentially a depth or macro sensor). The image processing capabilities of Qualcomm’s ISP within the Snapdragon 662 are generally more sophisticated than those found in Unisoc’s offerings, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction in the Nokia G100’s photos. The absence of OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Nokia G100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) benefits from Qualcomm’s established optimization and a more mature software ecosystem. Its Kryo 260 Gold cores, clocked at 2.0 GHz, offer a performance edge over the Moto E30’s Unisoc T700. While the T700 features Cortex-A75 cores, Unisoc’s optimization isn’t as refined. The Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged use. This translates to a smoother experience for multitasking and moderately demanding games on the Nokia G100.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Nokia G100’s 15W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Moto E30’s 10W charging. While neither is particularly fast by modern standards, the 15W charging will result in noticeably quicker top-ups, reducing downtime. The Snapdragon 662’s better power efficiency also contributes to potentially longer real-world battery life on the Nokia G100.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Moto E30 if you prioritize a newer chipset architecture and are comfortable with potentially less consistent performance in demanding applications. It's a good option for basic smartphone tasks and light social media use. Buy the Nokia G100 if you prefer a more proven and reliable chipset, a slightly faster charging experience, and a generally smoother user interface, even if it means sacrificing the novelty of the Unisoc T700.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc T700 in the Moto E30 struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Unisoc T700 can handle basic apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, it may exhibit occasional lag or slowdowns when multitasking or running multiple apps simultaneously. The Snapdragon 662 in the Nokia G100 offers a smoother experience for these everyday tasks.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge each phone from 0%?
With its 10W charging, the Motorola Moto E30 will likely take around 3-4 hours to fully charge. The Nokia G100, with its 15W charging, should complete a full charge in approximately 2.5-3 hours, offering a significant time saving.
❓ Is the Nokia G100 a good option for playing mobile games?
The Nokia G100 is the better choice for mobile gaming. The Snapdragon 662’s GPU provides more consistent frame rates and better thermal management, allowing for longer gaming sessions without significant throttling. The Moto E30 may struggle with more demanding titles.
❓ Which phone is likely to receive more software updates?
Historically, Nokia has offered a more consistent software update schedule for its devices, even in the budget segment. While Motorola has improved, the Nokia G100 is likely to receive updates for a longer period, potentially including security patches.
