Motorola Moto E22i vs Oppo A17k: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance

The Motorola Moto E22i and Oppo A17k represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both devices target first-time smartphone buyers and those seeking a reliable secondary device. However, subtle differences in their core components, specifically the chipset, dictate their performance characteristics. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for the price.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Motorola Moto E22i emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share a similar price point and target audience, the Helio G37 chipset within the E22i provides a marginal performance advantage, offering a smoother experience for everyday tasks and light gaming. The 10W charging is a drawback, but the performance edge is more impactful.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola Moto E22i Oppo A17k
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2022, September 162022, October 13
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, October 11Available. Released 2022, October 18
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back-
Dimensions163.6 x 74.7 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in)164.2 x 75.6 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight169 g (5.96 oz)189 g (6.67 oz)
 Water-repellent coatingIPX4 water resistance
Display
Protection-Panda Glass
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCD, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 12 (Go edition)Android 12, ColorOS 12.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC
Internal32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM64GB 3GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, panorama
Single-8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDR-
Single5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm5 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoNo
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO
RadioFM radioUnspecified
USBUSB Type-C 2.0microUSB 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximityFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging10W wired-
TypeLi-Po 4020 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGraphite Gray, Winter WhiteNavy Blue, Gold
Models-CPH2471
PriceAbout 90 EURAbout 130 EUR

Motorola Moto E22i

  • Slightly better performance with Helio G37
  • Potentially smoother multitasking
  • More responsive app loading

  • Slow 10W charging
  • Likely basic camera performance
  • Limited RAM (likely 2-4GB)

Oppo A17k

  • Potentially streamlined software experience (ColorOS)
  • Reliable for basic communication
  • Competitive price point

  • Lower performance with Helio G35
  • May struggle with multitasking
  • Likely basic camera performance

Display Comparison

Neither Motorola nor Oppo provide detailed display specifications beyond the basic panel size. Given the price bracket, both likely utilize LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. The absence of high refresh rates or advanced features like LTPO is expected. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, contributing to a less immersive viewing experience. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment, prioritizing power efficiency over color fidelity.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. Given the market segment, both phones likely feature a primary camera (potentially 13MP) and a depth sensor. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely symbolic, offering limited practical benefit due to the low resolution and lack of autofocus. Image processing will likely prioritize scene optimization over detail preservation. Expect acceptable results in well-lit conditions, but significant noise and softness in low-light environments. The aperture size of the main sensor will be a key determinant of low-light performance, but this information is currently unavailable.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipset: the Motorola Moto E22i features the Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37, while the Oppo A17k uses the Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35. Both are octa-core CPUs with the same core configuration (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53). However, the G37 boasts a slightly higher clock speed and a marginally improved GPU. This translates to a small performance advantage for the E22i in tasks like app loading and scrolling. Both phones will likely struggle with demanding games, but the G37 will offer a slightly more playable experience. RAM configurations are not specified, but both will likely ship with 2-4GB, further limiting multitasking capabilities. The 12nm process node is consistent across both chipsets, suggesting similar thermal characteristics.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the target market, both likely house a 4000-5000mAh battery. The Oppo A17k’s charging is not specified, but the Motorola Moto E22i is limited to 10W wired charging. This slower charging speed means a full charge will take considerably longer, potentially exceeding 3 hours. While the battery capacity might be similar, the slightly more power-hungry Helio G37 in the E22i could result in marginally shorter battery life under heavy use.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola Moto E22i if you prioritize a slightly more responsive user experience and anticipate running multiple apps or engaging in occasional light gaming. Its Helio G37 chipset offers a small but noticeable performance boost. Buy the Oppo A17k if you value a potentially more streamlined software experience (depending on ColorOS version) and are primarily focused on basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media use. The A17k is a solid option for those who need a dependable, no-frills device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Motorola Moto E22i handle popular social media apps like TikTok and Instagram smoothly?
The Moto E22i, with its Helio G37 chipset, should handle basic TikTok and Instagram usage without significant issues. However, intensive tasks like video editing or running multiple apps simultaneously may cause slowdowns. Expect a functional, but not necessarily fluid, experience.
❓ Is the Oppo A17k a good choice for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Yes, the Oppo A17k is an excellent choice for users who prioritize basic communication. The Helio G35 chipset is sufficient for calls, texts, and light messaging apps. Its focus is on reliability and battery life for essential functions, making it a dependable option for those needs.
❓ Can either of these phones run PUBG Mobile, and if so, at what settings?
Both phones will struggle to run PUBG Mobile at playable frame rates. If you can launch the game, you'll likely need to set the graphics to the absolute lowest settings and accept significant frame drops. These phones are not designed for demanding gaming.
❓ What version of Android do these phones ship with, and will they receive updates?
Both devices likely ship with Android Go Edition, a lightweight version of Android designed for low-end hardware. Update support is typically limited on phones in this price range. Expect at most one major Android version update, and security patches may be infrequent.