The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Motorola Moto E22 and the Samsung Galaxy A14. Both offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 emerges as the winner, offering a significantly better processor, potentially improved camera capabilities, and faster charging. While the Moto E22 is a decent budget option, the A14 provides a more well-rounded and future-proof experience for a slight price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2023, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 11 | Available. Released 2023, March 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.7 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version AOcta-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - Version B |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G80 (12 nm) - Version AExynos 850 (8 nm) - Version B |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1 or 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (32GB 3GB RAM model only) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Astro Black, Crystal Blue | Black, Dark Red, Silver, Green |
| Models | - | SM-A145F, SM-A145F/DSN, SM-A145M, SM-A145M/DS, SM-A145P, SM-A145R |
| Price | About 100 EUR | € 85.76 / $ 147.60 / £ 79.95 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.46 W/kg (head) 1.37 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E22
- Better Performance (Helio G80/Exynos 850)
- Larger & Sharper Display (FHD+)
- More Versatile Camera System
- Faster Charging (15W)
- Samsung's Software Support
- Slightly Higher Price
- One UI can be polarizing
Samsung Galaxy A14
- More Affordable
- Clean Android Experience
- Decent Battery Life
- Weaker Performance (Helio G37)
- Lower Resolution Display (HD+)
- Slower Charging (10W)
- Less Camera Quality
- Limited Software Updates
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically features a larger display (around 6.6 inches) with a higher resolution (FHD+) compared to the Moto E22 (around 6.5 inches, HD+). This translates to a sharper and more immersive viewing experience on the A14. Both likely use LCD panels, so don't expect OLED-level color accuracy or contrast.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer multiple rear cameras, the Galaxy A14 generally boasts a more capable main sensor and potentially better image processing. Expect better low-light performance and more detail in photos from the A14. The E22's camera is adequate for basic snapshots, but it won't compete with the A14's capabilities.
Performance
Here's where the Galaxy A14 pulls ahead. The Helio G80 (or Exynos 850) chipset in the A14 is considerably more powerful than the Helio G37 in the Moto E22. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A14. The A14's CPU architecture is also more modern, contributing to improved efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 5000mAh range, offering all-day battery life for moderate users. However, the Galaxy A14's faster 15W charging provides a quicker top-up compared to the Moto E22's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Moto E22? Users prioritizing a very budget-friendly device and a clean Android experience. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A14? Those seeking better performance, a more versatile camera system, and a longer software support lifespan, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 typically receives longer software update support compared to the Motorola Moto E22, thanks to Samsung's commitment to providing updates for their devices.
❓ Is the Moto E22 good for gaming?
The Moto E22 can handle basic games, but its weaker processor will struggle with more demanding titles. The Galaxy A14 is a better choice for gamers.
