Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Motorola Moto E22 and Samsung Galaxy A04e are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto E22 edges out the A04e thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better software support. However, Samsung's brand recognition and One UI might appeal to some. Both offer solid value for their price point, but the E22 provides a marginal performance advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 11 | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.7 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (32GB 3GB RAM model only) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Astro Black, Crystal Blue | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | - | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | About 100 EUR | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E22
- Slightly better chipset (Helio G37)
- Potentially higher refresh rate display
- Clean Android experience
- Water-repellent design (likely)
- Slow 10W charging
- Basic camera system
- Plastic build quality
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Samsung's One UI
- Brand recognition
- Potentially slightly better display calibration
- Likely slightly faster charging (though still slow)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P35)
- Standard 60Hz display
- Samsung's software can be bloated
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch display, likely with a resolution around 720 x 1600 pixels (HD+). Expect similar viewing experiences, though Samsung's display calibration might offer slightly better color accuracy. The Moto E22 may have a slightly higher refresh rate (potentially 90Hz) which would result in smoother scrolling.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E22 likely features a dual-camera setup (13MP main + 2MP depth sensor), while the A04e probably has a similar configuration. Image quality will be decent in good lighting conditions, but don't expect stellar results. Samsung's image processing might produce slightly more vibrant photos.
Performance
The Moto E22's Helio G37 chipset offers a slight edge over the A04e's Helio P35. While both are entry-level processors, the G37 generally provides better gaming performance and smoother multitasking. Expect both to handle everyday tasks without major issues.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life for moderate users. The Moto E22's 10W charging is a significant disadvantage compared to the A04e, which may support slightly faster charging speeds (though likely still slow). Expect around 15-20 hours of typical usage on both.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E22 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and a clean Android experience. The Samsung Galaxy A04e is a good fit for those who prefer Samsung's One UI and value brand recognition, even if it means a slight performance trade-off.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Motorola Moto E22 generally offers slightly better performance due to its Helio G37 chipset compared to the Galaxy A04e's Helio P35.
❓ Is the Samsung Galaxy A04e worth buying?
The Galaxy A04e is a decent budget option, especially if you prefer Samsung's One UI. However, the Moto E22 offers a bit more performance for a similar price.
