Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Motorola Moto E22 and Samsung Galaxy A04 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto E22 edges out the Galaxy A04 thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset and potentially better software support. While both offer solid value, the E22's Helio G37 provides a small performance advantage, making it the preferred pick for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 11 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 74.7 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 in) | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 169 g (5.96 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (32GB 3GB RAM model only) | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Astro Black, Crystal Blue | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E22
- Slightly better chipset (Helio G37)
- Potentially longer software support
- Clean Android experience
- Decent battery life
- 10W charging is slow
- Basic camera features
- Plastic build quality
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Samsung's One UI interface
- 50MP main camera (potentially better detail)
- Reliable brand reputation
- Large battery
- Less powerful chipset (Helio P35)
- Potentially shorter software support
- Can feel a bit bloated with Samsung apps
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing experiences for everyday use. However, the Moto E22 might have slightly better color accuracy, though both are adequate for the price point. Expect similar brightness levels and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E22 typically features a 13MP main camera with a depth sensor, while the Galaxy A04 often includes a 50MP main camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the A04 *could* produce slightly more detailed images in good lighting. Low-light performance will likely be similar on both.
Performance
The Moto E22's Helio G37 holds a slight edge over the Galaxy A04's Helio P35. While both are entry-level chipsets, the G37 generally offers better gaming performance and smoother multitasking. Expect some lag with demanding apps on both devices.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life under moderate usage. Charging speeds are limited to 10W on both devices, so expect relatively slow charging times.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E22 is ideal for users prioritizing a bit more performance and potentially longer software updates. The Samsung Galaxy A04 is a good choice for those deeply invested in the Samsung ecosystem or seeking a reliable, no-frills device with a familiar interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Motorola Moto E22 generally offers slightly better performance due to its Helio G37 chipset compared to the Galaxy A04's Helio P35.
❓ How long will the battery last on each phone?
Both phones have a 5000mAh battery and should provide all-day battery life with moderate usage. However, charging speeds are slow on both.
