Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Motorola Moto E20 and Samsung Galaxy A04e are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04e edges out the Moto E20 thanks to its slightly more powerful processor and potentially better software support. While both are budget options, the A04e provides a marginally smoother experience, making it the preferred choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 15 | 2022, October 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 04 | Available. Released 2022, November 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 12, One UI Core 4.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Black, Copper, Light Blue |
| Models | XT2155, XT2155-1, XT2155-3, XT2155-6 | SM-A042F, SM-A042F/DS, SM-A042M, SM-A042M/DS |
| Price | About 90 EUR | ₹ 7,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.29 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E20
- Clean Android experience
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Underpowered chipset
- Slow charging
- Basic camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A04e
- Slightly better performance
- Potentially longer software support
- Good battery life
- Samsung's One UI can be bloated
- Basic camera performance
- Slow charging
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. However, Samsung's display technology often provides slightly better color accuracy and brightness, though the difference is minimal at this price point. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E20 typically features a triple camera setup (13MP main, 2MP macro, 2MP depth) while the A04e often has a dual camera setup (50MP main, 2MP depth). While megapixels aren't everything, the A04e's 50MP main sensor *could* potentially capture more detail in good lighting conditions. Image processing quality will vary, but expect decent results for casual photography on both.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04e's MediaTek Helio P35 generally outperforms the Moto E20's Unisoc T606. While both are entry-level chipsets, the A04e's higher clock speeds on its Cortex-A53 cores provide a noticeable advantage in app loading times and general responsiveness. Don't expect high-end gaming performance from either device.
Battery Life
Both phones typically offer a large 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life with moderate usage. Charging speeds are limited to 10W on both devices, so expect relatively slow charging times.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E20 is ideal for users prioritizing simplicity and a clean Android experience on a tight budget. The Samsung Galaxy A04e is a better fit for those needing a bit more processing power for basic multitasking and potentially longer software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A04e is likely to receive longer software updates and security patches compared to the Moto E20, thanks to Samsung's generally better support for their budget devices.
❓ Can I play games on these phones?
Both phones are suitable for casual games. However, demanding titles will struggle to run smoothly on either device. The Galaxy A04e offers a slightly better gaming experience due to its more powerful chipset.
