The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for those seeking essential features without breaking the bank. Today, we pit two contenders against each other: the Motorola Moto E20 and the Samsung Galaxy A04. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges as the winner.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04 edges out the Moto E20 thanks to its slightly more powerful processor and potentially better software support. While both are budget options, the A04 offers a more responsive experience and a longer potential lifespan. However, the E20 might be more appealing if you prioritize a cleaner Android experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 15 | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 04 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | XT2155, XT2155-1, XT2155-3, XT2155-6 | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M |
| Price | About 90 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E20
- Clean Android experience
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Reliable brand
- Less powerful processor
- Basic camera performance
- Slow charging
- Limited software updates
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Slightly better performance
- Potentially longer software support
- Samsung ecosystem integration
- Higher resolution main camera
- Samsung's One UI can be bloated
- Plastic build quality
- Slow charging
- May not be as affordable as the E20
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. However, the Galaxy A04 might have slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to Samsung's display technology, though this is difficult to definitively confirm without testing. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E20 typically features a triple camera setup (13MP main, 2MP macro, 2MP depth) while the Galaxy A04 usually has a dual camera setup (50MP main, 2MP depth). While megapixels aren't everything, the A04's higher resolution main sensor *could* potentially capture more detail in good lighting conditions. Image processing will be a key differentiator, and Samsung's software often provides a more polished result.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04's Helio P35 chipset holds a slight advantage over the Moto E20's Unisoc T606. The A04's CPU configuration, with higher clock speeds on some cores, translates to a more responsive feel during multitasking and app loading. The E20, while adequate for basic tasks, may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones are expected to have a 5000mAh battery, offering all-day battery life for moderate users. Charging speeds are similar at 10W wired, meaning a full charge will take around 2-3 hours for both devices.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E20 is ideal for users who prioritize a near-stock Android experience, simple functionality, and a very affordable price point. The Samsung Galaxy A04 is a better choice for those who want a slightly more powerful processor, potentially longer software updates, and the Samsung ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A04 is likely to receive longer software updates and security patches compared to the Motorola Moto E20, thanks to Samsung's commitment to supporting its A-series devices.
❓ Is the Moto E20 good for gaming?
The Moto E20 is suitable for very light gaming, but it will struggle with more demanding titles. The Galaxy A04 offers a slightly better gaming experience due to its more powerful processor.
