Looking for an affordable smartphone that won't break the bank? The Motorola Moto E20 and Samsung Galaxy A03 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both phones share the same Unisoc T606 chipset. The Samsung Galaxy A03 edges out the Moto E20 due to Samsung's typically better software support and potentially slightly improved camera processing, despite similar hardware. Ultimately, the best choice depends on price and brand preference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 15 | 2021, November 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 04 | Available. Released 2022, January 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 75.5 x 8.5 mm (6.49 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| | Water-repellent coating | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Gray | Black, Blue, Red |
| Models | XT2155, XT2155-1, XT2155-3, XT2155-6 | SM-A035F, SM-A035F/DS, SM-A035M, SM-A035G |
| Price | About 90 EUR | € 119.90 / £ 88.00 / ₹ 11,990 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.20 W/kg (head) 1.35 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E20
- Clean Android experience
- Affordable price
- Decent battery life
- Triple camera setup (though quality is basic)
- Slow charging
- Basic camera performance
- Plastic build quality
- Limited software updates
Samsung Galaxy A03
- Samsung's One UI
- Potentially better camera processing
- Brand recognition
- Likely longer software support
- Slightly higher price
- Dual camera setup
- Slow charging
- Plastic build quality
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display. While the resolution is similar, Samsung's display technology might offer slightly better color accuracy and viewing angles. However, the difference is likely minimal and not a deciding factor for most users.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E20 typically has a triple camera setup (13MP main + 2MP macro + 2MP depth) while the Galaxy A03 has a dual camera setup (13MP main + 2MP depth). Samsung's image processing often results in slightly more vibrant and detailed photos, even with similar hardware. Video recording capabilities are basic on both.
Performance
Powered by the same Unisoc T606 chipset, expect similar performance from both devices. Everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming should be handled adequately. Don't expect flagship-level performance; these are budget phones.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life under moderate usage. Charging speeds are limited to 10W wired charging on both devices, so expect relatively slow charging times.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E20 is a good option for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and a slightly lower price point. The Samsung Galaxy A03 is ideal for those who prefer Samsung's One UI and value longer software update support, even within the budget segment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A03 is likely to receive longer software update support compared to the Motorola Moto E20, a common advantage for Samsung devices.
❓ Are these phones good for gaming?
Neither phone is ideal for demanding games. They can handle basic games, but performance will be limited due to the chipset and limited RAM.
