Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Motorola Moto E13 and Samsung Galaxy F04 are two contenders vying for the budget crown. But which one truly delivers the best experience for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy F04 edges out the Moto E13 thanks to its slightly faster processor and quicker 15W charging. While both are budget options, the F04 offers a more responsive experience and faster top-ups, making it a better overall value proposition.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 24 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | Water-resistant design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 12, One UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green | Jade Purple, Opal Green |
| Models | - | SM-E045F, SM-E045F/DS |
| Price | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.38 W/kg (head) |
Motorola Moto E13
- Clean Android experience
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Slower processor
- Slow charging (10W)
- Basic camera performance
Samsung Galaxy F04
- Faster processor (Helio P35)
- Faster charging (15W)
- Samsung's brand recognition
- Bloatware (potential)
- Average camera quality
- HD+ display resolution
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. However, Samsung's display technology often provides slightly better color accuracy and brightness, though the difference is minimal at this price point. Expect similar viewing experiences overall.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E13 typically features a dual-camera setup (50MP main + 2MP depth) while the Galaxy F04 often has a triple camera (50MP main + 2MP macro + 2MP depth). Image quality is generally acceptable in good lighting conditions for both, but expect some noise and limited dynamic range. Samsung's image processing might offer slightly more vibrant colors.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy F04's MediaTek Helio P35 generally outperforms the Moto E13's Unisoc T606. While both are entry-level chipsets, the F04's CPU configuration provides a noticeable boost in responsiveness, especially when navigating the UI and running basic apps. The E13 might feel slightly sluggish in comparison.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life. However, the Galaxy F04's 15W charging support provides a faster charging experience compared to the Moto E13's 10W charging. This means you'll spend less time plugged in.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E13 is ideal for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy F04 is a better choice for those needing a bit more processing power for light gaming or multitasking and appreciate faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Samsung Galaxy F04 generally offers better gaming performance due to its slightly more powerful processor.
❓ Is the Moto E13 worth buying if I prioritize a clean Android experience?
Yes, the Moto E13's clean Android experience is a significant advantage for those who prefer a bloatware-free interface.
❓ How long does the battery last on each phone?
Both phones offer all-day battery life with moderate usage, thanks to their 5000mAh batteries.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung typically provides longer software support and updates compared to Motorola, although both are budget devices.
