Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Motorola Moto E13 and Samsung Galaxy A04 are two contenders vying for the budget crown. But which one truly delivers the best experience for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A04 edges out the Moto E13 thanks to its slightly more powerful processor and generally better software support. While both are budget options, the A04 offers a more polished experience, making it the slightly better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 24 | 2022, August 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2022, October 10 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 164.4 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179.5 g (6.35 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| | Water-resistant design | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 13 (Go edition) | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, One UI Core 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, PDAF | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Creamy White, Aurora Green | Black, Green, White, Copper |
| Models | - | SM-A045F, SM-A045F/DS, SM-A045M |
| Price | $ 119.99 / € 104.99 | About 70 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.32 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Moto E13
- Clean Android experience
- Modern design
- Decent battery life
- Affordable price
- Less powerful processor
- Slow charging
- Basic camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A04
- Slightly better performance
- Samsung's software support
- Good battery life
- Reliable brand
- Less exciting design
- Slow charging
- Basic camera performance
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering decent viewing angles for everyday use. However, Samsung's display technology often provides slightly better color accuracy and brightness, though the difference is minimal at this price point. The Moto E13 might have a slightly more modern design.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E13 typically features a dual-camera setup (50MP main + 2MP depth) while the Galaxy A04 has a similar configuration (50MP main + 2MP macro). Image quality is comparable in good lighting conditions, but both struggle in low light. Samsung's image processing might offer slightly more vibrant colors.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A04's Helio P35 chipset generally outperforms the Moto E13's Unisoc T606. While both are entry-level processors, the A04 handles multitasking and light gaming a bit more smoothly. Expect some lag on both devices with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones pack a 5000mAh battery, promising all-day battery life under moderate usage. Charging speeds are limited to 10W on both devices, so expect a relatively slow charging time.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Moto E13 is ideal for users prioritizing a clean Android experience and basic functionality. The Samsung Galaxy A04 is a better fit for those who want a bit more processing power and the reliability of Samsung's software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better software updates?
The Samsung Galaxy A04 generally receives more consistent and longer-term software updates compared to the Motorola Moto E13.
❓ Can I play games on these phones?
Both phones can handle basic games, but don't expect high frame rates or smooth performance with demanding titles. The Galaxy A04 performs slightly better in this regard.
