Motorola Moto E (2020) vs Samsung Galaxy A03s: The Ultimate Budget Battle

Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Motorola Moto E (2020) and Samsung Galaxy A03s are two popular contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A03s edges out the Moto E (2020) thanks to its slightly better display brightness, longer battery life, and faster charging. While the Moto E offers a decent Snapdragon chipset, the A03s provides a more well-rounded experience for the price.

PHONES
Phone Names	Motorola Moto E (2020)	Samsung Galaxy A03s

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 30, 66, 71	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Speed	HSPA, LTE	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE
	CDMA2000 1xEV-DO	2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A037U

Launch
Announced	2020, June 05. Released 2020, June 10	2021, August 18
Status	Discontinued	Available. Released 2021, August 18

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	159.8 x 76.6 x 8.7 mm (6.29 x 3.02 x 0.34 in)	164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	185 g (6.53 oz)	196 g (6.91 oz)
	Water-repellent coating	-

Display
Resolution	720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density)	720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size	6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~78.4% screen-to-body ratio)	6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	PLS LCD

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver)	Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
Chipset	Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm)	Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
GPU	Adreno 506	PowerVR GE8320
OS	Android 10	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 Core

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (dedicated slot)	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM	32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
	eMMC 5.1	eMMC 5.1

Main Camera
Dual	13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens	-
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash
Single	-	5 MP, f/2.2
Triple	-	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video	1080p@30/60fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	-
Single	5 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm	5 MP, f/2.2
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	4.2, A2DP, LE	5.0, A2DP
NFC	No	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	FM radio	No
USB	microUSB 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity

Battery
Charging	-	15W wired
Type	Li-Po 3550 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Midnight Blue	Black, Blue, White
Models	XT2052DL	SM-A037F, SM-A037F/DS, SM-A037M, SM-A037G, SM-A037U, SM-S134DL, SM-A037W, SM-A037U1, SM-S135DL
Price	About 90 EUR	$ 65.65 / £ 82.99 / ₹ 10,800
SAR EU	-	0.36 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 122h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1718:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-27.4 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 103465 (v8), 101299 (v9) GeekBench: 889 (v5.1) GFXBench: 5.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola Moto E (2020)

Slightly more powerful processor
Clean Android experience
Generally reliable brand

Lower display brightness
Slower charging
Less versatile camera

Samsung Galaxy A03s

Brighter display
Longer battery life
Faster charging (15W)
Likely better camera versatility

Less powerful processor than Moto E (2020)
Samsung's One UI can be bloated

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A03s boasts a measured peak brightness of 488 nits, offering a noticeably brighter viewing experience compared to the Moto E (2020), which lacks specific brightness data but is generally considered less vibrant. Both have a 1718:1 contrast ratio, indicating good black levels, but the A03s' brightness gives it an edge.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality is a key differentiator. The Galaxy A03s likely has a more versatile camera setup, potentially including a depth sensor for better portrait mode. The Moto E (2020) typically has a simpler single camera setup. Specific camera specs are missing, but the A03s is expected to perform better in various lighting conditions.

Performance

The Motorola Moto E (2020) utilizes a Qualcomm Snapdragon 632, known for its efficiency. The Samsung Galaxy A03s features a Mediatek Helio P35. While the Snapdragon 632 generally offers slightly better raw performance, the Helio P35 is efficient and sufficient for everyday tasks. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A03s shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 122 hours. The Moto E (2020) has a decent battery, but falls short of the A03s' longevity. The A03s also supports 15W wired charging, a faster charging speed than the Moto E (2020).

Buying Guide

The Motorola Moto E (2020) is ideal for users prioritizing a slightly more powerful processor for basic tasks and light gaming. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better choice for those who value a brighter display, longer battery life, and faster charging speeds, especially for media consumption.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?

The Motorola Moto E (2020) has a slightly more powerful processor, which *might* offer a marginally better gaming experience, but both are entry-level phones and won't handle demanding games well.

❓ Which phone has better software support?

Samsung generally provides longer software update support than Motorola, although both are budget devices and updates may be limited.