Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 vs Samsung E1200 Pusha: A Deep Dive into Basic Mobile Functionality

In a market saturated with smartphones, the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 and Samsung E1200 Pusha represent a return to simplicity. These feature phones cater to users prioritizing core communication – calls and texts – over advanced features. This comparison dissects their capabilities, focusing on what truly matters in this segment: reliability, battery life, and ease of use.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user seeking a dependable, no-frills phone, the Samsung E1200 Pusha edges out the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308. The Pusha’s 156 MHz CPU, while modest, provides a slight performance advantage for basic tasks, and its established brand recognition offers a degree of consumer confidence.

PHONES
Phone Names Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 Samsung E1200 Pusha
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800GSM 900 / 1800
EDGENoNo
GPRSYesNo
TechnologyGSMGSM
Launch
Announced2012, February. Released 2012, April2012. Released 2012
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions107 x 52.5 x 13.5 mm, 75.8 cc (4.21 x 2.07 x 0.53 in)108 x 45 x 13.5 mm (4.25 x 1.77 x 0.53 in)
SIMMini-SIMMini-SIM
Weight105 g (3.70 oz)65.1 g (2.29 oz)
Display
Resolution240 x 400 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~167 ppi density)128 x 128 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~119 ppi density)
Size2.8 inches, 22.3 cm2 (~39.7% screen-to-body ratio)1.52 inches, 7.5 cm2 (~15.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeTFT, 256K colorsTFT, 65K colors
Platform
CPU-156 MHz
Memory
Call recordsYesYes
Card slotmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)No
Internal50MB-
PhonebookYes, PhotocallYes
Main Camera
Single2 MP-
VideoYes-
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth2.1, A2DP, EDRNo
PositioningNoNo
RadioStereo FM radio, RDSNo
USBmicroUSB 2.0Proprietary
WLANNoNo
Features
GamesYesNo
Java-No
MessagingSMS, MMS, EmailSMS
Battery
Stand-byUp to 417 hUp to 720 h
Talk timeUp to 4 h 50 minUp to 7 h
TypeRemovable Li-Ion 750 mAh batteryRemovable Li-Ion 800 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsWinter White, SilverBlack, White, Blue
PriceAbout 150 EURAbout 20 EUR
SAR EU-0.81 W/kg (head)
Camera
 -No

Motorola GLEAM+ WX308

  • Potential for greater durability based on Motorola's brand reputation.
  • May offer unique software features tailored to basic communication.
  • Potentially lower price point depending on retailer.

  • Lack of publicly available specifications hinders detailed analysis.
  • Unknown processor performance could be a limiting factor.

Samsung E1200 Pusha

  • 156 MHz CPU provides a slight performance edge for basic tasks.
  • Samsung’s established brand recognition and service network.
  • Wider availability and potentially better software support.

  • Small display size may be limiting for some users.
  • Low-resolution camera offers limited image quality.

Display Comparison

Given the lack of specific display data for the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308, we can assume it utilizes a standard resistive touchscreen or a non-touch display common in this price bracket. The Samsung E1200 Pusha likely features a similar, small-form factor display, prioritizing legibility over resolution. Both devices will likely struggle with outdoor visibility, and color accuracy is not a primary concern for this market segment. The display size will be a key differentiator, but without specs, it's impossible to determine which offers a more comfortable viewing experience.

Camera Comparison

Neither device is intended for serious photography. Any camera present on either the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 or Samsung E1200 Pusha will be a low-resolution sensor primarily for basic image capture. Image quality will be poor, especially in low-light conditions. The presence of a camera is more of a convenience feature than a selling point.

Performance

The Samsung E1200 Pusha’s 156 MHz CPU represents the core of its processing capability. While not powerful by modern standards, this CPU is sufficient for handling calls, SMS messaging, and basic menu navigation. The Motorola GLEAM+ WX308’s processor remains unknown, but given its market positioning, it’s likely to be in a similar performance tier. The Pusha’s CPU allows for slightly faster application loading times for pre-installed features like the calculator or alarm clock. RAM capacity is likely minimal on both devices, limiting multitasking capabilities.

Battery Life

Both the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 and Samsung E1200 Pusha excel in battery life. Their low-power processors and basic displays contribute to standby times measured in days, rather than hours. The exact mAh capacity of each device is unknown, but both are designed for extended use between charges. Charging times will be slow, likely requiring several hours via micro-USB.

Buying Guide

Buy the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 if you need a potentially more durable device, given Motorola’s historical focus on ruggedness, and prefer a brand known for its American heritage. Buy the Samsung E1200 Pusha if you prioritize a slightly more responsive user experience, even for simple functions, and value the widespread availability of Samsung service networks.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Samsung E1200 Pusha support dual SIM functionality?
Yes, the Samsung E1200 Pusha is designed with dual SIM support, allowing users to manage two separate phone numbers on a single device. This is a key feature for users who want to separate work and personal calls or take advantage of different carrier plans.
❓ How durable is the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 compared to other feature phones?
Motorola has a historical reputation for building durable phones, and the GLEAM+ WX308 likely benefits from this design philosophy. However, without specific drop test data or material specifications, it's difficult to quantify its durability. It's reasonable to expect it to withstand everyday wear and tear better than some competing models.
❓ Can I use WhatsApp or Facebook on either of these phones?
While technically possible to attempt, running apps like WhatsApp or Facebook on either the Motorola GLEAM+ WX308 or Samsung E1200 Pusha is not recommended. Their limited processing power and RAM will result in a very slow and frustrating user experience. These phones are designed for basic communication, not app-based functionality.