Motorola G96 vs. Edge 30 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and sustained performance, the Motorola G96 is the better buy. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a noticeable advantage in CPU and GPU tasks. However, the Edge 30 Neo’s 68W charging is a significant convenience factor, making it ideal for those who frequently need a quick power boost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola G96 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 09 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 16 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 73.3 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178 g (6.28 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 1600 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 1 major Android upgrade | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone (Greener Pastures, Cattleya Orchid, Dresden Blue, Ashleigh Blue) | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | - | XT2245-1 |
| Price | ₹ 16,304 | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola G96
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Improved thermal efficiency for sustained performance
- Potentially better value for performance-focused users
- Slower 30W charging
- Display likely less bright than Edge 30 Neo
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- Brighter display (1004 nits)
- 5W wireless charging support
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially more throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1004 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the G96. This makes the Edge 30 Neo far more usable in direct sunlight. While both displays are listed with an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), the higher peak brightness is a tangible benefit. The G96’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially lower quality panel, though color accuracy and resolution are not specified for either device.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. The absence of details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography. It's likely both rely on software processing to enhance image quality, and the 2MP macro cameras commonly found in this segment are unlikely to deliver significant value.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola G96’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) is architecturally superior to the Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 7s Gen 2 features four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz, providing a substantial performance uplift over the 695’s two Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the 7s Gen 2 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. While the 695 offers 5G connectivity, the 7s Gen 2 provides a more robust overall performance experience.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite unspecified battery capacities. However, the Edge 30 Neo’s charging capabilities are dramatically faster, supporting 68W wired charging and 5W wireless charging, while the G96 is limited to 30W wired charging. This means the Edge 30 Neo can replenish its battery much more quickly, going from 0-100% in a fraction of the time compared to the G96.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola G96 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding apps and games without significant throttling, and if you value raw processing power over ultra-fast charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize convenience and rapid charging, and if your usage primarily revolves around social media, streaming, and light gaming. The Edge 30 Neo is also a better fit for users who value a brighter display for outdoor visibility.