Motorola G Pure vs Samsung Galaxy A03s: The Ultimate Budget Battle

Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Motorola G Pure and Samsung Galaxy A03s are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A03s edges out the Motorola G Pure thanks to its slightly faster processor, brighter display, and faster charging. While both are budget options, the A03s provides a more polished and enjoyable user experience overall.

PHONES
Phone Names	Motorola G Pure	Samsung Galaxy A03s

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
Speed	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps	HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE	GSM / HSPA / LTE
	-	2, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14, 25, 26, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A037U

Launch
Announced	2021, October 07	2021, August 18
Status	Available. Released 2021, October 14	Available. Released 2021, August 18

Body
Build	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	167.4 x 75.6 x 8.8 mm (6.59 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)	164.2 x 75.9 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.36 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	188 g (6.63 oz)	196 g (6.91 oz)
	Water-repellent design	-

Display
Resolution	720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)	720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)
Size	6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio)	6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD	PLS LCD

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)	Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
Chipset	Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm)	Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)
GPU	PowerVR GE8320	PowerVR GE8320
OS	Android 11	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 Core

Memory
Card slot	microSDXC (dedicated slot)	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM	32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM
	eMMC 5.1	eMMC 5.1

Main Camera
Dual	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens	-
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash
Single	-	5 MP, f/2.2
Triple	-	13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	-
Single	5 MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm	5 MP, f/2.2
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	5.0, A2DP, LE	5.0, A2DP
NFC	No	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0	USB Type-C 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band	Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (rear-mounted)	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity

Battery
Charging	10W wired	15W wired
Type	Li-Po 4000 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Deep Indigo	Black, Blue, White
Models	XT-2163-4, XT2163-4, XT2163-6, XT2163-1, XT2163-2	SM-A037F, SM-A037F/DS, SM-A037M, SM-A037G, SM-A037U, SM-S134DL, SM-A037W, SM-A037U1, SM-S135DL
Price	$ 63.99 / C$ 123.00	$ 65.65 / £ 82.99 / ₹ 10,800
SAR EU	-	0.36 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 122h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1718:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-27.4 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 103465 (v8), 101299 (v9) GeekBench: 889 (v5.1) GFXBench: 5.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Motorola G Pure

Simple and clean Android experience
Potentially lower price
Decent battery life

Slower processor
Dimmer display
Slower charging
Basic camera

Samsung Galaxy A03s

Brighter display
Slightly faster processor
Longer battery life
Faster charging

Samsung's One UI can be bloated
Basic camera
Plastic build quality

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A03s boasts a noticeable advantage with its measured 488 nits max brightness, making it easier to see outdoors. Both phones feature a 1718:1 contrast ratio, indicating decent black levels, but the A03s' brightness gives it a clearer edge. The G Pure's display is adequate but less vibrant.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is generally comparable on both devices, as both are budget phones. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light. The A03s may have a slight edge due to potentially better image processing, but it's not a significant difference. Both offer basic camera features.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy A03s' Helio P35 chipset (2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 cores) offers a slight performance boost over the G Pure's Helio G25 (2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores). While neither phone is a powerhouse, the A03s will handle everyday tasks and light multitasking a bit more smoothly. Expect some lag on both devices with demanding apps.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A03s shines here with an impressive endurance rating of 122 hours. This suggests significantly longer battery life than the Motorola G Pure, which, while decent, doesn't match the A03s' longevity. The A03s' 15W charging is also faster than the G Pure's 10W.

Buying Guide

The Motorola G Pure is a good choice for users prioritizing a simple, no-frills experience and potentially a slightly lower price point. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is better suited for those who want a brighter screen, a bit more performance, and faster charging speeds.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better battery life?

The Samsung Galaxy A03s has significantly better battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 122 hours compared to the G Pure.

❓ Is the Motorola G Pure worth buying?

The G Pure is a viable option if you're on a very tight budget and prioritize a clean Android experience. However, the A03s offers more value overall.