Motorola G Pure vs. OnePlus Nord N100: A Deep Dive into Budget Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord N100 emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 460, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge over the G Pure’s 12nm Helio G25. The 18W charging is a significant advantage, mitigating the impact of a potentially smaller battery (spec not provided).
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola G Pure | OnePlus Nord N100 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat13 400/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 66, 71 - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 07 | 2020, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 14 | Available. Released 2020, November 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 75.6 x 8.8 mm (6.59 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.9 x 75.1 x 8.5 mm (6.49 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10, OxygenOS 10.5.9 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | - |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Indigo | Midnight Frost |
| Models | XT-2163-4, XT2163-4, XT2163-6, XT2163-1, XT2163-2 | BE2013, BE2015, BE2011, BE2012 |
| Price | $ 63.99 / C$ 123.00 | About 80 EUR |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 125.00 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 129.00 |
Motorola G Pure
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Simpler, less cluttered software experience (typical of Motorola)
- Lower price point (potentially)
- Significantly slower charging (10W)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G25)
- Likely lower sustained performance
OnePlus Nord N100
- Faster charging (18W)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 460)
- Better overall performance
- More responsive user experience
- OxygenOS can be more resource intensive than Motorola's UI
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a premium display. Details on panel type, resolution, and refresh rate are missing for the G Pure, suggesting a basic LCD. The Nord N100 also likely features an LCD, but the focus here is on the chipset impact on UI smoothness. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, reflecting their budget positioning. Color accuracy will likely be standard for this price range, prioritizing power efficiency over fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market segment suggests both phones will rely on budget sensors. The presence of a 64GB/4GB RAM configuration on the N100 indicates a greater emphasis on software features, potentially including more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The G Pure likely employs simpler image processing. The absence of OIS on either device means image stabilization will rely heavily on software, where the N100’s potentially more powerful chipset could provide an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord N100’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm) benefits from a more efficient manufacturing process compared to the Motorola G Pure’s MediaTek Helio G25 (12nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 460’s Kryo 240 cores, clocked at 1.8GHz, offer a slight frequency advantage over the G Pure’s 2.0GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The 11nm process node is crucial; it translates to lower power consumption and potentially less thermal throttling under sustained load. This means the N100 will likely maintain performance for longer during tasks like gaming or video editing. The G Pure's CPU configuration, with a mix of 2.0GHz and 1.5GHz cores, suggests a focus on burst performance, but the less efficient process will limit its sustained capabilities.
Battery Life
The Motorola G Pure’s 10W charging is a significant disadvantage. While battery capacity isn’t specified, 10W charging will require a considerably longer time to reach a full charge. The OnePlus Nord N100’s 18W charging offers a substantial improvement, potentially reducing charge times by 40-50%. This is a critical advantage for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day. Even if the G Pure has a slightly larger battery capacity, the slower charging speed will likely negate that benefit for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola G Pure if your primary need is absolute simplicity and a minimal software experience, and you prioritize a potentially longer-lasting battery over raw performance. Buy the OnePlus Nord N100 if you value a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and a chipset that’s better equipped to handle modern apps and light gaming. The N100 is the better all-rounder for the average smartphone user.