Motorola G Pure vs. Moto G Power: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G Power generally wins due to its superior processor, better performance, and longer battery life. While the G Pure is slightly more affordable, the G Power's overall capabilities justify the small price difference for most users seeking a reliable budget device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola G Pure | Motorola Moto G Power |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 07 | 2020, February 07. Released 2020, April 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 14 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, aluminum frame (6000 series) |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 75.6 x 8.8 mm (6.59 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.8 x 9.6 mm (6.30 x 2.98 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 16 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Indigo | Smoke Black |
| Models | XT-2163-4, XT2163-4, XT2163-6, XT2163-1, XT2163-2 | XT2041DL |
| Price | $ 63.99 / C$ 123.00 | - |
Motorola G Pure
- Most affordable option
- Decent display for the price
- Lightweight design
- Weak processor
- Subpar performance
- Average camera quality
- Shorter battery life
Motorola Moto G Power
- Better performance
- Longer battery life
- Improved camera
- More responsive user experience
- Slightly more expensive
- Design can be bulky
- HD+ display isn't the sharpest
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.5-inch HD+ display, offering adequate viewing for basic tasks. However, the Moto G Power's slightly better color accuracy and brightness often provide a marginally improved visual experience. The G Pure's display is functional but lacks the vibrancy of the G Power.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G Power generally takes better photos, especially in well-lit conditions. While both have a triple-camera setup, the G Power's image processing is superior, resulting in more detailed and vibrant images. Low-light performance is also better on the G Power.
Performance
The Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G Power significantly outperforms the Helio G25 in the G Pure. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user experience on the G Power. The G Pure can feel sluggish, especially when handling more demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Moto G Power is the clear winner in battery life. Its larger battery capacity (typically 5000mAh) provides significantly longer usage times compared to the G Pure. Expect all-day battery life with moderate use on the G Power, while the G Pure may require charging before the end of the day.
Buying Guide
The Motorola G Pure is a good option for users on a very tight budget who prioritize affordability above all else and don't need high performance. The Moto G Power is ideal for users who want a phone with a long-lasting battery, decent performance for everyday tasks, and a slightly better camera experience.