Motorola G Pure vs. Moto E (2020): A Detailed Budget Phone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto E (2020) edges out the G Pure thanks to its slightly more powerful Snapdragon 632 chipset and generally smoother performance. While the G Pure boasts a larger battery, the Moto E's efficiency and better processor make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola G Pure | Motorola Moto E (2020) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 25, 26, 30, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 07 | 2020, June 05. Released 2020, June 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 14 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.4 x 75.6 x 8.8 mm (6.59 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 159.8 x 76.6 x 8.7 mm (6.29 x 3.02 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~271 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.9 cm2 (~78.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 250 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762G Helio G25 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM632 Snapdragon 632 (14 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 506 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM |
| eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.0, 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.4, 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted) | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Po 3550 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Deep Indigo | Midnight Blue |
| Models | XT-2163-4, XT2163-4, XT2163-6, XT2163-1, XT2163-2 | XT2052DL |
| Price | $ 63.99 / C$ 123.00 | About 90 EUR |
Motorola G Pure
- Larger display
- Longer battery life (on paper)
- Affordable price
- Slower performance
- Less refined camera
- Can feel sluggish
Motorola Moto E (2020)
- Better performance
- Slightly better camera
- More responsive user experience
- Compact design
- Smaller battery (though still good)
- Less impressive display brightness
Display Comparison
Both phones feature HD+ displays, but the Moto E (2020) often has slightly better color accuracy and brightness. The G Pure's larger screen (6.53 inches vs 6.2 inches) might be preferable for those who watch a lot of videos.
Camera Comparison
The Moto E (2020) generally takes slightly better photos, especially in well-lit conditions. Both phones have basic camera setups, but the Moto E's image processing tends to be a bit more refined. Both struggle in low light.
Performance
The Snapdragon 632 in the Moto E (2020) is noticeably faster and more efficient than the Helio G25 in the G Pure. Expect smoother multitasking, app loading, and overall responsiveness on the Moto E. The G Pure can feel sluggish at times.
Battery Life
The G Pure has a larger battery (5000mAh vs 4000mAh), but the Moto E (2020)'s more efficient processor means battery life is surprisingly comparable. Both should easily last a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Motorola G Pure is ideal for users prioritizing maximum battery life and a larger display for media consumption, even if it means sacrificing some performance. The Motorola Moto E (2020) is a better fit for those who want a more responsive experience, a slightly better camera, and a more balanced overall package.