Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) vs. Sony Xperia 1 IV: A Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and quick top-ups, the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) is the stronger choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the Xperia 1 IV’s 30W, and the price difference is substantial. However, the Sony Xperia 1 IV caters to photography and videography enthusiasts with its dedicated features and potentially superior image processing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) | Sony Xperia 1 IV |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 7, 12, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - Verizon, USA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 24 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| - | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 125mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", dual pixel PDAF, 3.5x-5.2x continuous optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.5", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| - | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Blue, Stardust White | Black, Violet, White |
| Models | - | XQCT62-B, XQCT54, XQCT54C0V.YD, XQCT54C0B.YD, XQCT54C0W.YD, XQCT54C0V.EEAC, XQCT54C0B.EEAC, XQ-CT72, XQ-CT54, XQ-CT62, SO-51C |
| Price | About 850 EUR | $ 1,120.00 / € 489.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 838832 (v9) GeekBench: 3403 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022)
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Missing display specifications (brightness, refresh rate)
- Limited camera details provided
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load (unconfirmed)
Sony Xperia 1 IV
- Professional-grade camera system
- High-quality display with infinite contrast ratio
- Optimized for content creation and consumption
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Higher price tag
- Less focus on rapid charging convenience
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, but their displays diverge. The Sony Xperia 1 IV boasts an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting a true OLED panel, while the Motorola’s display specs are not provided. The Xperia 1 IV’s measured 602 nits peak brightness is respectable, but the Motorola’s brightness remains unknown. The absence of refresh rate information for the Motorola is a key omission; the Xperia 1 IV likely benefits from a smoother experience if it incorporates LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, optimizing battery life. The Xperia 1 IV’s display is geared towards color accuracy and professional use, while the Motorola’s display characteristics are less defined.
Camera Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 IV is clearly positioned as the photography and videography powerhouse. While both phones share the same chipset, Sony’s expertise in imaging sensors and image processing is a significant advantage. The Xperia 1 IV’s camera system is described as 'Photo / Video', indicating a comprehensive feature set. The Motorola’s camera specs are not detailed, making a direct comparison difficult. Sony’s emphasis on manual controls and professional features, like 4K 120fps video recording, are absent in the Motorola’s description. The Xperia 1 IV likely benefits from superior image stabilization and dynamic range.
Performance
Both the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) and the Sony Xperia 1 IV are powered by the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an Octa-core CPU configuration (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). This means raw processing power will be largely comparable. However, thermal management and sustained performance are where differences may emerge. The Motorola’s larger chassis *could* offer better cooling potential, but without specific thermal testing data, it’s difficult to say. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5 RAM, but the speed isn’t specified. The Xperia 1 IV’s focus on video recording and prolonged use cases suggests Sony may have prioritized sustained performance through software optimization.
Battery Life
Both devices share a 100h endurance rating, which is a somewhat vague metric. The Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) offers a substantial charging advantage with its 68W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes. The Sony Xperia 1 IV’s 30W wired charging (PD3.0, PPS) takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Motorola also includes 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging, features the Xperia 1 IV also supports, but details are lacking. The Motorola’s faster charging mitigates concerns about battery capacity, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) if you need blazing-fast charging, a more affordable flagship experience, and don't require the absolute best in mobile photography. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 IV if you prioritize a professional-grade camera system, a high-quality display for content creation and consumption, and are willing to pay a premium for a specialized experience.