Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 delivers superior processing power, and the 68W charging significantly outperforms the Pixel 6 Pro’s 23W. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s unique software experience and camera processing remain compelling advantages.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 7, 12, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - Verizon, USA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 24 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Blue, Stardust White | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | - | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 850 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022)
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 processor
- Potentially better thermal management
- Software updates may be less frequent than Pixel
- Camera processing may not be as refined as Pixel
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Superior AI and machine learning capabilities
- Exceptional camera software and features
- Guaranteed timely software updates
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Tensor chip may throttle under sustained load
- Potentially less raw processing power
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 846 nits, offering excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022)'s display specs aren't provided, Motorola typically uses high-quality panels. The Pixel 6 Pro’s contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal), suggesting a true OLED experience. Both phones likely utilize high refresh rate displays, but the Pixel 6 Pro’s LTPO technology dynamically adjusts the refresh rate for improved efficiency, a feature not confirmed for the Motorola. The Pixel 6 Pro’s curved display edges contribute to a more immersive viewing experience, though some users may prefer the flat panel potentially found on the Motorola.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, driven by the Tensor chip’s image signal processor. While specific sensor details aren’t provided for either phone, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing algorithms are a key differentiator, offering features like Magic Eraser and Face Unblur. The Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) likely relies more on hardware capabilities, but without sensor size information, a direct comparison is difficult. The Pixel 6 Pro’s focus on software-based enhancements provides a distinct advantage for users who prioritize image quality and editing features. We'll disregard the likely inclusion of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices as they offer minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) is powered by the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.00 GHz. This architecture is designed for sustained peak performance. In contrast, the Google Pixel 6 Pro utilizes Google’s Tensor chip (5nm), with a CPU configuration of 2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 cores. While the Tensor chip excels in AI tasks, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 generally offers superior raw CPU and GPU performance. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 provides better thermal efficiency than the 5nm Tensor, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Motorola also benefits from potentially faster LPDDR5x RAM, though this isn't explicitly stated.
Battery Life
Both the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) and the Google Pixel 6 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, their charging capabilities differ significantly. The Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) supports 68W wired charging, reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes. The Pixel 6 Pro is limited to 23W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Motorola also offers 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, while the Pixel 6 Pro matches the 23W wireless charging and includes reverse wireless charging. The Motorola’s faster charging is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding applications, or frequent multitasking, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a refined software experience with exclusive features like Magic Eraser, prioritize computational photography, and appreciate a more balanced overall package.