Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G vs Motorola Edge+: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its significantly brighter display (858 nits vs 607 nits) and dramatically faster charging (50W vs 18W) offer tangible benefits, outweighing the Edge+'s slightly cleaner software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge+ (2020) | Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66, 71 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40 - Global |
| 5G bands | 5, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global | 1, 3, 7, 28, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G 4 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 22. Released 2020, May 14 | 2020, February 13. Released 2020, February 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 71.4 x 9.6 mm (6.34 x 2.81 x 0.38 in) | 162.5 x 74.8 x 9 mm (6.40 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~95.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Triple-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, 5x hybrid zoom 20 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Video | 6K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.9µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 50W wired, PD3.0 30W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Smokey Sangria, Thunder Grey, Baltic Gray | Alpine White, Solstice Grey |
| Models | XT2061-3 | M2001J1G |
| Price | About 670 EUR | About 930 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 595246 (v8) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 42fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge+ (2020)
- Near-stock Android experience
- Clean and minimalist design
- Solid battery endurance (100h)
- Significantly lower display brightness
- Slow 18W wired charging
- Limited wireless charging speed (15W)
Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G
- Much brighter display (858 nits)
- Ultra-fast 50W wired charging
- Faster 30W wireless charging
- MIUI software customization may not appeal to all
- Potentially more bloatware
- Design may be considered more ostentatious
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro’s display is the clear winner here. With a measured peak brightness of 858 nits, it significantly outshines the Motorola Edge+'s 607 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While both utilize AMOLED technology, the Mi 10 Pro’s higher brightness and infinite (nominal) contrast ratio deliver a more visually impactful experience. The Edge+ doesn’t specify PWM dimming rate, while the Mi 10 Pro’s display characteristics would be more comfortable for users sensitive to flicker.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the provided data lacks the detail to declare a definitive winner. Both are capable of Photo and Video capture. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, it’s difficult to assess image quality differences. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is also a significant omission. We can assume both offer a range of shooting modes, but a detailed analysis requires more data.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+), featuring the same Octa-core CPU configuration. This means performance in CPU-bound tasks will be virtually identical. However, the Mi 10 Pro benefits from potentially more aggressive thermal management due to Xiaomi’s cooling solutions, though detailed thermal testing data isn’t available in the provided context. Both utilize LPDDR5 RAM, ensuring snappy multitasking. The real-world performance difference will likely be negligible for most users.
Battery Life
Both the Motorola Edge+ and Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro achieve an endurance rating of approximately 100-101 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging experience is where the Mi 10 Pro truly excels. Its 50W wired charging, supported by PD3.0, drastically reduces charging times compared to the Edge+'s 18W wired charging. The Mi 10 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, a substantial upgrade over the Edge+'s 15W wireless charging. This makes the Mi 10 Pro far more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge+ (2020) if you prioritize a near-stock Android experience and value a more understated design. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 10 Pro 5G if you demand a vibrant, high-brightness display, incredibly fast charging, and don't mind Xiaomi's MIUI software customization.