Motorola Edge+ (2020) vs LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW: A Deep Dive into Performance and Endurance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term battery life and a more streamlined software experience, the Motorola Edge+ (2020) emerges as the better choice. Its 100-hour endurance rating significantly surpasses what the LG V60 likely achieves, despite the latter’s potentially faster charging speeds. However, the LG V60’s wider charging protocol support offers flexibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge+ (2020) | LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 66, 71 - Global | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 20, 28, 46, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 5, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6 - Global | 260, 261 mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5G 4 Gbps DL | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (7CA) Cat22, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, April 22. Released 2020, May 14 | 2020, February 26. Released 2020, April 02 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 71.4 x 9.6 mm (6.34 x 2.81 x 0.38 in) | 169.3 x 77.6 x 8.9 mm (6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (pre-installed) |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 218 g (7.69 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) MIL-STD-810G compliant* Method 516.6, Procedure IV "Transit Drop" *does not guarantee ruggedness or use in extreme conditions | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~95.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - dual-SIM model |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (standard), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/1.9, 12mm (ultrawide), 1/3.4", 1.0µm 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, f/1.4, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.33", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 81mm (telephoto), 3x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1.0µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth) | - |
| Video | 6K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, HDR10+, 24-bit/192kHz stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 25 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.9µm | 10 MP, f/1.9, 30mm (standard), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 32-bit/192kHz audio 24-bit/192kHz audio recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio (USA model only) |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | Wired, PD2.0, QC4 Wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Smokey Sangria, Thunder Grey, Baltic Gray | Classy Blue, Classy White |
| Models | XT2061-3 | LM-V600VML, LMV600VML |
| Price | About 670 EUR | About 870 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.12 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Edge+ (2020)
- Exceptional 100-hour battery endurance
- Clean Android software experience
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Relatively slow 18W wired charging
- Limited camera details in provided specs
LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW
- Faster wired charging with PD2.0 and QC4
- Wireless charging support
- Potentially superior camera system (based on LG's history)
- Likely lower battery endurance than the Edge+
- Software support concerns due to LG's exit from the mobile market
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge+ boasts a display capable of reaching 607 nits of peak brightness, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the LG V60’s display specifications aren’t provided, LG was known for its high-quality panels, potentially offering comparable brightness. However, without specific data on color accuracy or refresh rate (assumed 60Hz on both), the Edge+’s measured brightness gives it a slight edge in direct sunlight readability. The lack of LTPO technology on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature the Snapdragon 865’s image signal processor, but details on camera sensors are limited. The context data only mentions 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Given LG’s history with strong camera performance, the V60 likely features a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and better image stabilization. However, without specific sensor sizes, apertures, or OIS details, it’s impossible to definitively declare a winner. The presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 5G (7nm+), featuring an identical CPU configuration: an octa-core setup with 1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77, 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. Performance will largely depend on RAM configuration (not specified) and thermal management, which is unknown for both. The 7nm+ process node offers a balance between performance and efficiency, but sustained workloads could lead to throttling on both devices.
Battery Life
This is where the Motorola Edge+ truly shines. Its reported 100-hour endurance rating is a significant advantage over the LG V60. While the V60 supports faster wired charging with PD2.0 and QC4, and wireless charging, the Edge+ offers 18W wired, 15W wireless, and even 5W reverse wireless charging. The Edge+'s superior endurance means users will likely rely less on frequent charging, mitigating the benefit of the V60’s faster charging speeds. The LG V60’s charging wattage, while faster, doesn’t compensate for a potentially lower overall battery capacity and efficiency.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge+ (2020) if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use, prefer a cleaner Android experience with minimal bloatware, and value a phone that can reliably last through demanding tasks without needing frequent top-ups. Buy the LG V60 ThinQ 5G UW if you prioritize faster charging speeds, appreciate the versatility of Qualcomm Quick Charge and PD2.0 compatibility, and potentially benefit from LG’s unique software features (though software support is a concern).