Motorola Edge X30 vs Edge 30 Fusion: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge X30 boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, offering superior performance for demanding tasks. However, the Edge 30 Fusion shines with its exceptional display brightness and impressive battery endurance. Ultimately, the X30 is for power users, while the Fusion prioritizes longevity and visual quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge X30 | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 09 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 15 | Available. Released 2022, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, MYUI 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm or 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm, under display | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 100% in 35 min | 68W wired, 50% in 10 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5000 mAh (regular version)· Li-Po 4800 mAh (under screen camera version) | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta |
| Models | XT2201-2, XT2201-6 | XT2243-1 |
| Price | About 420 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge X30
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Faster Charging (68W)
- Potentially Better Image Processing
- Likely Shorter Battery Life
- Display Not as Bright as Fusion
- Missing Detailed Camera Specs
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
- Exceptional Battery Life (101h Endurance Rating)
- High Display Brightness (946 nits)
- Excellent Contrast Ratio (Infinite)
- Less Powerful Processor (Snapdragon 888+)
- Slower Performance
- Missing Detailed Camera Specs
Display Comparison
The Edge 30 Fusion takes a clear lead in the display department. Its measured 946 nits peak brightness is significantly higher than the X30, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the X30's display is good, the Fusion's contrast ratio (nominally infinite) suggests excellent black levels and vibrant colors. Both phones likely feature OLED panels, but the Fusion's brightness advantage is notable.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing. Assuming similar sensor sizes and features, the X30's more powerful processor might allow for slightly better image processing and video stabilization. However, real-world camera performance will depend on software optimization and specific lens quality, which are not detailed here.
Performance
Here, the Edge X30 dominates. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a flagship chipset, significantly more powerful than the Snapdragon 888+ in the Edge 30 Fusion. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in graphically intensive games on the X30. The X30's 4nm process also contributes to improved efficiency compared to the Fusion's 5nm.
Battery Life
The Edge 30 Fusion claims an impressive endurance rating of 101 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the X30's 68W charging is faster (35 minutes for 100%), the Fusion's larger battery capacity (likely) contributes to its superior longevity. The 68W charging on both is still very respectable.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge X30? Gamers, content creators, and anyone prioritizing raw processing power will appreciate the X30's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion? Users seeking long battery life, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a more budget-friendly option will find the Fusion appealing.