Motorola Edge S30 vs Moto G200 5G: The Ultimate Flagship Killer Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G200 5G edges out the Edge S30 thanks to its exceptional battery life and slightly brighter display. While both offer blazing-fast performance, the G200's endurance and screen quality make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge S30 | Motorola Moto G200 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 12 | 2021, November 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 21 | Available. Released 2022, February 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 168.1 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 | LCD, 144Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, MYUI 2.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30ps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Phantom Black | Stellar Blue, Glacier Green |
| Models | XT2175-2 | - |
| Price | About 280 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1633:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 682346 (v8), 811124 (v9) GeekBench: 3319 (v5.1) GFXBench: 60fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge S30
- Sleek design
- Flagship performance
- Fast 120Hz OLED display
- Potentially more refined software (region dependent)
- Shorter battery life
- Potentially less impressive camera compared to G200
- 33W charging is relatively slow
Motorola Moto G200 5G
- Exceptional battery life (102h endurance)
- Bright 558 nits display
- High-resolution 108MP main camera
- Flagship performance
- Less premium build quality
- Software updates can be slower
- 33W charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.8-inch OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth visuals. However, the Moto G200 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 558 nits, slightly exceeding the Edge S30's reported brightness. The contrast ratio is excellent on both, but the G200's brightness gives it a slight edge in outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
The Moto G200 5G typically features a 108MP main camera, an 8MP ultrawide, and a 2MP macro lens. The Edge S30 often includes a 50MP main camera, a 13MP ultrawide, and a depth sensor. While megapixels aren't everything, the G200's higher resolution main sensor *could* offer more detail in well-lit conditions. Image processing and software features will heavily influence the final image quality.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 888+ chipset, both devices deliver flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, demanding games to run flawlessly, and snappy app loading times. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal, though software optimization could play a role.
Battery Life
This is where the Moto G200 5G truly shines. It boasts an impressive endurance rating of 102 hours, significantly outperforming the Edge S30. The Edge S30's battery capacity is likely smaller, contributing to its shorter battery life. Users who prioritize longevity will find the G200 a much better choice.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge S30 is ideal for users prioritizing a sleek design and potentially a slightly more refined software experience (depending on region). The Moto G200 5G is perfect for those who demand all-day battery life and a vibrant display, even if it means a slightly less premium feel.