Poco X6 Pro vs Motorola Edge 60s: Which Dimensity Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Edge 60s’ Dimensity 7400, translating to smoother gaming and faster app loading. While the Edge 60s offers a more polished software experience, the X6 Pro’s raw power and competitive price are hard to ignore.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 60s | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 73.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Slipstream, Amazonite, Zephyr, Mykonos Blue | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | - | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Edge 60s
- Potentially cleaner software experience (Motorola's near-stock Android)
- 68W fast charging
- Sleek design (assumed based on Motorola's design language)
- Less powerful Dimensity 7400 chipset
- Limited display brightness information
- Camera specs largely unknown
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Significantly faster Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- High peak display brightness (1148 nits)
- Excellent battery life (11:46h active use)
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potential for bloatware
- Design may be less refined than Motorola
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Edge 60s (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the X6 Pro’s brighter panel demands more power. The X6 Pro’s panel technology is not specified, but given the brightness, it likely employs advanced backlight control. The Edge 60s’ display specs are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and refresh rate difficult, but the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is clear.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information for the Edge 60s is lacking. The Poco X6 Pro’s camera is described as offering both photo and video capabilities, suggesting a versatile setup. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture details for the Edge 60s, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The X6 Pro likely benefits from MediaTek’s Imagiq ISP, offering advanced image processing capabilities. The presence of OIS on the X6 Pro would be a significant advantage for video stabilization and low-light photography, but this is unconfirmed.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra features a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and three additional A715 cores, alongside four A510 cores, offering a substantial performance advantage over the Motorola Edge 60s’ Dimensity 7400, which uses four Cortex-A78 and four Cortex-A55 cores peaking at 2.6 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the higher clock speeds, translates to a noticeable improvement in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The X6 Pro’s GPU will also deliver significantly higher frame rates. While both phones likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, the X6 Pro’s superior chipset will be the primary performance driver.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates superior battery endurance with an active use score of 11:46h, indicating a well-optimized power management system. Both devices support fast charging, with the Poco X6 Pro achieving a full charge in 45 minutes using 67W wired charging, supporting QC2.0 and PD3.0 standards. The Edge 60s offers 68W wired charging, potentially offering slightly faster charging speeds, but the X6 Pro’s longer battery life provides a more substantial real-world benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 60s if you prioritize a streamlined software experience and a more balanced feature set. It’s ideal for users who value a clean Android interface and don’t demand the absolute highest performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you’re a power user, gamer, or simply want the most processing power for your money. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra excels in demanding tasks, and the fast charging is a significant convenience.