Motorola Edge 60s vs. Google Pixel 8a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity and a polished software experience, the Google Pixel 8a is the better choice. Its exceptional 40:06h battery endurance and Google Tensor G3’s AI capabilities outweigh the Motorola Edge 60s’ faster charging, making it a more reliable daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 60s | Google Pixel 8a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - G6GPR (International) |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G6GPR (International) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2024, May 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2024, May 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 73.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) | 152.1 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 180 g (6.35 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~430 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1500 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 120Hz, 2000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP (16 MP eff.), f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra HDR, panorama, Best Take |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent) |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4492 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Slipstream, Amazonite, Zephyr, Mykonos Blue | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Aloe |
| Models | - | GKV4X, G6GPR, G8HHN, G576D |
| Price | - | $ 229.98 / C$ 417.99 / £ 279.00 / € 299.99 / ₹ 33,300 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 40:06h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class B |
Motorola Edge 60s
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- Potent Mediatek Dimensity 7400 processor
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Battery life data unavailable, likely shorter than Pixel 8a
- Less sophisticated camera software
Google Pixel 8a
- Exceptional battery life (40:06h endurance)
- Google Tensor G3 with AI-powered features
- Industry-leading camera software and image processing
- Slower 18W wired charging
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8a boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1508 nits, making it far more usable in direct sunlight compared to the Edge 60s (brightness data unavailable). While the Edge 60s’ panel characteristics are unknown, the Pixel 8a’s OLED panel delivers vibrant colors and excellent contrast. The Pixel 8a’s display is likely to offer a smoother experience due to its higher refresh rate (assumed 90Hz based on Pixel A-series history) compared to the Edge 60s (assumed 60Hz).
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8a’s camera prowess is largely driven by Google’s computational photography, leveraging the Tensor G3’s AI capabilities. While sensor sizes are unknown for both devices, the Pixel 8a’s image processing is renowned for its dynamic range and accurate color reproduction. The Edge 60s likely relies more on hardware specifications, but without detailed information, it’s difficult to assess its image quality relative to the Pixel 8a. The Pixel 8a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior due to the Tensor G3’s dedicated image signal processor.
Performance
Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but their chipsets differ significantly. The Google Tensor G3, with its nona-core configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510), prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, offering advantages in image processing and voice recognition. The Motorola Edge 60s’ Mediatek Dimensity 7400 (octa-core: 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) focuses on raw CPU and GPU performance. While the Cortex-X3 in the Tensor G3 is a higher-performing core, the Dimensity 7400’s Cortex-A78 cores are still very capable. The Pixel 8a benefits from Google’s software optimization, potentially mitigating the raw clock speed difference.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 8a dominates in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 40:06h rating and an active use score of 11:25h. This is a substantial advantage over the Motorola Edge 60s, which lacks published battery life data. However, the Edge 60s compensates with significantly faster 68W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in under an hour. The Pixel 8a’s 18W charging, while supporting PD3.0 and 7.5W wireless charging with bypass charging, is considerably slower. The Pixel 8a’s 1000 cycle battery longevity also suggests a longer lifespan.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 60s if you need a phone that can quickly top up its battery – its 68W charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 8a’s 18W. This is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing a boost throughout the day. Buy the Google Pixel 8a if you prefer a phone that can comfortably last a full day (and beyond) on a single charge, coupled with Google’s industry-leading camera software and guaranteed software updates.