Motorola Edge 60 vs Xiaomi 13 Lite: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 60 emerges as the stronger choice, particularly the India variant with the Dimensity 7400. However, the Xiaomi 13 Lite offers a competitive package with fast charging and a stylish design, making it a viable option for those valuing aesthetics and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 60 | Xiaomi 13 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2023, February 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 25 | Available. Released 2023, March 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm or 8.2 mm | 159.2 x 72.7 x 7.2 mm (6.27 x 2.86 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) | 171 g (6.03 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~91.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 720Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits peak | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - GlobalOcta-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - India | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) - GlobalMediatek Dimensity 7400 (4 nm) - India | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 644 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 12, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.3, (depth) |
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 0.64µm | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired | 67W wired, 100% in 40 min |
| Type | Market-dependent versions:· 5200 mAh (Global)· 5500 mAh (China, India) | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Shamrock, Plum perfect | Black, Lite Blue, Lite Pink |
| Models | XT2505-1, XT2505-4 | - |
| Price | £ 299.99 / € 299.00 | About 180 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.95 W/kg (head) 1.22 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 93h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 534143 (v9) GeekBench: 2936 (v5.1), 2434 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 58:54h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Edge 60
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially better performance with Dimensity 7300/7400
- Longer battery lifespan (1000 cycles)
- Design may be less visually striking than the 13 Lite
- Camera details are limited, making a full assessment difficult
Xiaomi 13 Lite
- Faster charging (claimed 100% in 40 minutes)
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Potentially strong selfie camera performance
- Dimmer display compared to the Edge 60
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 may be outperformed by Dimensity 7400
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 60 boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1401 nits, compared to the Xiaomi 13 Lite’s 938 nits. This difference translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both feature infinite (nominal) contrast ratios, the Edge 60’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The 13 Lite’s display, while still good, will appear comparatively dimmer in bright environments. We lack PWM frequency data for both, but display quality leans heavily towards the Edge 60.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capabilities for both. Given the market positioning, we can infer the Xiaomi 13 Lite likely emphasizes selfie performance, a common Xiaomi strength. The Motorola Edge 60, with its potentially larger sensor (based on brand tendencies), may excel in low-light photography. Without specific sensor size and aperture details, a definitive camera comparison is difficult, but the Edge 60’s potential for better low-light performance gives it a slight edge.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 60 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (Global) or 7400 (India), both built on a 4nm process. The India variant’s slightly higher CPU clock speed (2.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz) offers a modest performance boost. The Xiaomi 13 Lite is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, also a 4nm chip. Architecturally, the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 features a 1x Cortex-A710 prime core, while the Dimensity 7300/7400 use 4x Cortex-A78 cores. This suggests the Dimensity chips may offer better multi-core performance, while the Snapdragon’s prime core could excel in single-threaded tasks. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization, but the Edge 60, particularly the India version, likely holds a performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 60 claims an impressive 58:54h endurance rating and 13:32h of active use, suggesting excellent battery optimization despite a relatively standard battery capacity. The Xiaomi 13 Lite, with a 93h endurance rating, appears competitive, but this figure is older and may not reflect current software optimizations. Both support 67-68W wired charging, with the Xiaomi 13 Lite claiming a full charge in 40 minutes. The Edge 60’s 1000 cycle battery lifespan claim suggests greater long-term battery health, a significant benefit for users planning to keep their phones for several years.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 60 if you need a phone capable of handling demanding tasks and appreciate a brighter, more visible screen outdoors. Its Dimensity chipset (especially the 7400 in India) provides a performance edge. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Lite if you prefer a lighter, more aesthetically pleasing device with a focus on quick charging and a generally smooth user experience for everyday tasks.