Motorola Edge 60 Stylus vs. Google Pixel 7a: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the stronger choice. Its Tensor G2 chip provides a smooth, intelligent experience, and its camera consistently delivers excellent results. However, users who heavily rely on stylus input and value faster charging will find the Motorola Edge 60 Stylus a more suitable option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 60 Stylus | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 15 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1400 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 15W wireless | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | PB7S0000IN | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | ₹ 18,727 | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus
- Integrated Stylus for enhanced productivity
- 68W Wired Charging for incredibly fast top-ups
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is less powerful than Tensor G2
- Camera performance likely lags behind Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Google Tensor G2 for smooth performance and AI features
- Exceptional Camera Quality with Google’s image processing
- Guaranteed Software Updates and Android experience
- Slower 18W Wired Charging
- No integrated stylus
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s display shines with a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, offering excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Motorola Edge 60 Stylus’s display specs aren’t provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Pixel 7a’s 90Hz refresh rate contributes to smoother scrolling and animations, a feature potentially absent in the Motorola. The Pixel 7a’s display is also likely to have better color accuracy due to Google’s calibration, making it ideal for content consumption.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a standout feature, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are missing for both, the Pixel 7a’s image processing is renowned for its dynamic range, accurate colors, and excellent low-light performance. The Motorola Edge 60 Stylus likely relies more on hardware specifications, but without knowing those details, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s processing power and advanced stabilization features. We can safely assume the Pixel 7a will deliver more consistent and higher-quality results across various shooting scenarios.
Performance
The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) chip, featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core, offers a performance advantage over the Motorola Edge 60 Stylus’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm). The X1 core provides a significant boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth multitasking. While the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is efficient, the Tensor G2’s integrated machine learning capabilities enhance features like voice recognition and image processing. The Pixel 7a’s GPU will also outperform the Adreno GPU in the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, leading to better gaming performance. The 5nm process of the Tensor G2 also contributes to better thermal management under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a boasts an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating strong battery life despite its 18W wired charging. The Motorola Edge 60 Stylus compensates with significantly faster 68W wired charging, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time. While the Pixel 7a supports 7.5W wireless charging, the Motorola offers 15W wireless charging, providing a slightly faster wireless charging experience. The combination of the Pixel 7a’s efficient Tensor G2 chip and optimized software contributes to its impressive endurance, potentially offsetting the slower charging speed for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 60 Stylus if you need a built-in stylus for note-taking, sketching, or precise navigation, and if rapid 68W charging is a priority. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a streamlined Android experience with guaranteed updates, exceptional camera performance, and benefit from Google’s AI-powered features.