Motorola Edge 60 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing speed, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the Motorola Edge 60 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 7 Pro’s superior camera system, intelligent software features, and longer-term software support make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 60 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 24 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.7 x 73.1 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~92.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 720Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits peak | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama, Pantone Validated Colour and Skin Tones | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 90W wired, PD3.0 15W wireless 5W reverse wired | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Pantone: Shadow, Dazzling Blue , Sparkling Grape | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | XT2507-1 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | € 399.00 / $ 515.00 / £ 445.00 / ₹ 27,599 | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| SAR EU | 0.90 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 67:47h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Edge 60 Pro
- Blazing-fast 90W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 8350 Extreme chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Camera system lacks Pixel’s computational photography
- Software update commitment may be shorter than Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera system with AI features
- Seamless Google ecosystem integration
- Long-term software support and updates
- Slower 23W charging
- Tensor G2 chipset less powerful for sustained workloads
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 60 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1595 nits compared to the Pixel 7 Pro’s 1090 nits. This translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Pixel 7 Pro’s display has an infinite contrast ratio (nominal), the Edge 60 Pro’s higher peak brightness provides a more impactful HDR experience. Both displays utilize smooth refresh rates, but the Edge 60 Pro’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator for outdoor users.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro’s camera system is its defining feature. While specific sensor details are not provided, Google’s computational photography prowess is well-established. The Pixel 7 Pro excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and image stabilization. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro, while capable, lacks the same level of software optimization and AI integration. The Pixel’s video capabilities are also superior, offering features like Cinematic Blur. The absence of detailed sensor information for the Edge 60 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s reputation and feature set give it a clear advantage.
Performance
The chipset choice is where these phones diverge significantly. The Motorola Edge 60 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8350 Extreme, fabricated on a 4nm process, while the Pixel 7 Pro features Google’s Tensor G2, built on a 5nm node. Despite the smaller node size of the Tensor G2, the Dimensity 8350 Extreme’s CPU configuration – with its Cortex-A715 cores clocked up to 3.35 GHz – delivers a noticeable performance edge in raw processing power. The Pixel 7 Pro’s Tensor G2 prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, excelling in areas like voice recognition and image processing, but falls behind in sustained CPU-intensive workloads. The Edge 60 Pro’s architecture is geared towards gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 7 Pro initially claimed an 83-hour endurance rating, while the Motorola Edge 60 Pro achieves 67:47 hours. However, the Edge 60 Pro compensates with significantly faster charging – 90W wired, capable of a substantial charge in minutes – compared to the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The Edge 60 Pro also offers 15W wireless and 5W reverse wired charging, while the Pixel 7 Pro provides 23W wireless and reverse wireless. The Edge 60 Pro’s active use score of 16:14h suggests efficient power management despite the smaller battery, and the rapid charging mitigates any concerns about battery life for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 60 Pro if you need a phone that can rapidly recharge, handle demanding games without throttling, and offers a more customizable Android experience. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a phone with an exceptional camera, seamless integration with Google services, and a focus on AI-powered features like Magic Eraser and Call Screen. The Pixel is also the better choice for those who value consistent software updates and a polished user interface.