Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) vs. Sony Xperia 1 IV: A Detailed Comparison of Snapdragon Flagships
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing value and quick top-ups, the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) is the stronger choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the Xperia 1 IV’s 30W, and the price difference is substantial. However, the Sony Xperia 1 IV caters to photography and videography enthusiasts with its dedicated features and refined image processing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) | Sony Xperia 1 IV |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (Dual SIM model only) | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 2, 5, 7, 12, 25, 26, 29, 30, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - Verizon, USA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A (CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Asia | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 24 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, June 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 71 x 8.2 mm (6.50 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Single SIM (Nano-SIM) or Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1644 x 3840 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~643 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 98.6 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| Always-on display | Runs at 1096 x 2560 pixels except for select use cases | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.X | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF 2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 125mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", dual pixel PDAF, 3.5x-5.2x continuous optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.5", dual pixel PDAF 0.3 MP, TOF 3D, (depth) |
| Video | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Ready For support | Native Sony Alpha camera support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 35 min (advertised) 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min Wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmos Blue, Stardust White | Black, Violet, White |
| Models | - | XQCT62-B, XQCT54, XQCT54C0V.YD, XQCT54C0B.YD, XQCT54C0W.YD, XQCT54C0V.EEAC, XQCT54C0B.EEAC, XQ-CT72, XQ-CT54, XQ-CT62, SO-51C |
| Price | About 850 EUR | $ 1,120.00 / € 489.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 838832 (v9) GeekBench: 3403 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022)
- Significantly faster 68W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Potential for better thermal management due to larger size
- Camera details are unknown, likely inferior to Sony
- Display specifications are limited, potential flicker concerns
Sony Xperia 1 IV
- Superior camera system with advanced features
- High-quality display with infinite contrast ratio
- Sony’s refined software and multimedia experience
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Higher price tag
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 throttling potential
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, but their displays diverge. The Sony Xperia 1 IV boasts an infinite contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting a true OLED panel, while the Motorola’s display specs are not provided. The Xperia 1 IV’s measured 602 nits peak brightness is respectable, but the Motorola’s brightness remains unknown. The absence of PWM dimming rate information for the Motorola raises potential concerns for users sensitive to flicker, a detail Sony often prioritizes in its displays. The Xperia 1 IV’s aspect ratio is likely 21:9, geared towards video consumption, while the Motorola likely uses a more standard 20:9 ratio.
Camera Comparison
The Sony Xperia 1 IV is clearly positioned as the photography-focused device. While both phones share the same chipset, Sony’s expertise in image processing and sensor technology is a significant advantage. The Xperia 1 IV’s camera system is described as 'Photo / Video', indicating a comprehensive feature set. The Motorola’s camera details are absent, but it’s unlikely to match the Sony’s capabilities, particularly in low-light performance and video recording quality. The absence of sensor size information for the Motorola makes a direct comparison impossible, but Sony’s history suggests a larger, more sophisticated sensor in the Xperia 1 IV.
Performance
Both the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) and the Sony Xperia 1 IV are powered by the Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an Octa-core CPU configuration (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2, 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). This means raw CPU performance will be very similar. However, thermal management will be the key differentiator. The Motorola’s larger size *potentially* allows for a more robust cooling solution, mitigating the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1’s known tendency to throttle under sustained load. RAM specifications are not provided for either device, but both likely utilize LPDDR5 for fast memory access.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 100h, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging approaches. However, the *way* they achieve that endurance differs drastically. The Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) boasts 68W wired charging, promising a 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes (advertised). The Sony Xperia 1 IV offers a slower 30W wired charging, taking 30 minutes to reach 50%. The Motorola also includes 15W wireless and 5W reverse wireless charging, features the Sony also supports, but without specified wattage details. The Motorola’s faster charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge+ 5G UW (2022) if you need blazing-fast charging, a more affordable flagship experience, and don't require the advanced camera features of the Sony. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 IV if you prioritize a professional-grade camera system, a high-quality multimedia experience, and are willing to pay a premium for Sony’s unique software and hardware integration.