Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs Xiaomi 14T Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 14T Pro emerges as the slightly stronger choice. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset delivers a performance edge, particularly in CPU-intensive tasks, and its 120W charging is demonstrably faster. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra’s brighter display and potentially more refined software experience make it a viable alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | Xiaomi 14T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 16 | 2024, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 15 | Available. Released 2024, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), wooden back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Panda X) |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm (6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 in) | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· eSIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 209 g (7.37 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, Ultra HDR, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.4, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2.6x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, 10-bit Rec. 2020, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz | Titan Gray, Titan Blue, Titan Black |
| Models | - | 2407FPN8EG |
| Price | $ 939.00 / C$ 1,299.00 / £ 490.00 / € 609.90 / ₹ 59,999 | $ 550.00 / £ 498.00 / € 539.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially more efficient chipset for sustained performance
- 50W wireless charging offers convenience
- Slightly slower CPU performance compared to the Dimensity 9300+
- Wired charging is marginally slower than the Xiaomi 14T Pro
Xiaomi 14T Pro
- More powerful CPU for demanding tasks
- Faster 120W wired charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially superior image processing capabilities
- Slightly dimmer display compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- MIUI software may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Both devices feature vibrant displays, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a slight lead with a measured peak brightness of 1473 nits, compared to the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s 1228 nits. This difference translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s impact on overall power draw should be considered; the brighter panel of the Motorola may offset some of the chipset’s efficiency gains. We lack panel technology details (LTPO, PWM frequency) but brightness is a clear win for Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role. Mediatek’s Imagiq 990 in the Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful processor, but Qualcomm’s Spectra ISP in the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is also highly regarded. The absence of sensor size information makes it difficult to assess image quality potential. We can assume both phones will offer capable camera systems, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro’s more powerful chipset may provide an edge in computational photography tasks.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 14T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ boasts a higher peak CPU clock speed (3.4 GHz Cortex-X4) compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.0 GHz Cortex-X4). The 14T Pro also features three Cortex-X4 cores versus one in the Motorola, suggesting a significant advantage in multi-threaded workloads. While both are built on a 4nm process, the Dimensity 9300+'s architecture appears to offer a raw performance advantage. However, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is known for its excellent efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance under heavy load. Both devices utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the real-world impact will depend on the specific configuration and software optimization.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra achieving 12:56h of active use and the Xiaomi 14T Pro close behind at 12:32h. The difference is minimal, suggesting similar real-world endurance. However, charging speeds are a key differentiator. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra supports 125W wired charging, while the Xiaomi 14T Pro offers 120W, claiming a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Xiaomi also boasts 50W wireless charging, with a full charge in 45 minutes, matching the Motorola’s wireless speed. The faster wired charging of the Xiaomi 14T Pro is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you prioritize display brightness and a potentially cleaner software experience, and value wireless charging convenience. Buy the Xiaomi 14T Pro if you demand maximum CPU performance for demanding applications, prioritize the fastest possible wired charging, and are comfortable with Xiaomi’s MIUI software.