Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs. Sony Xperia 1 VII: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and convenience, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is the better choice. Its 125W charging and competitive performance offer a compelling package. However, the Sony Xperia 1 VII wins for those demanding ultimate battery life and a more refined, long-term software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | Sony Xperia 1 VII |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Europe |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Europe |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 16 | 2025, May 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 15 | Available. Released 2025, June 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), wooden back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm (6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 in) | 162 x 74 x 8.2 mm (6.38 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 103.7 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Adreno 830 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15, up to 4 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.4, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.35", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 85mm (telephoto), f/3.5, 170mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3.5x-7.1x continuous optical zoom, OIS, 4cm macro @ 120mm, no AF 48 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 12 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/2.9", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 6.0, A2DP, LE Audio, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz | Moss Green, Orchid Purple, Slate Black |
| Models | - | XQ-FS54, XQFS54EUKCG.GC, XQFS54EUKCV.GC, XQFS54EUKCB.GC, PDX256 |
| Price | $ 939.00 / C$ 1,299.00 / £ 490.00 / € 609.90 / ₹ 59,999 | € 1,338.99 / $ 1,394.99 / £ 1,149.94 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | - | 43:30h endurance, 1400 cycles |
| Energy | - | Class B |
| Free fall | - | Class B (181 falls) |
| Repairability | - | Class D |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- Incredibly fast 125W wired charging
- Competitive performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Versatile charging options (50W wireless, 10W reverse wireless)
- Shorter battery life compared to the Xperia 1 VII
- Software experience may not be as refined as Sony’s
Sony Xperia 1 VII
- Exceptional battery life and 1400 charge cycles
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite processor with Oryon CPU cores
- Premium build quality and creator-focused features
- Slower charging speed (30W wired)
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
Both the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and Sony Xperia 1 VII boast excellent displays, achieving nearly identical peak brightness levels at 1473 and 1475 nits respectively. This ensures excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. However, the Xperia 1 VII’s longevity is bolstered by its rated 1400 charge cycles, suggesting a more durable panel over the long term. While both likely employ LTPO technology for variable refresh rates (though not explicitly stated for the Motorola), Sony’s history suggests a focus on color accuracy crucial for professional content creation, potentially exceeding the Motorola’s calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, Sony’s Xperia line is renowned for its image processing and optical expertise. The Xperia 1 VII likely prioritizes natural color reproduction and dynamic range, appealing to photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, while potentially offering a higher megapixel count (not specified), may lean towards more saturated, social media-friendly images. The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also likely more advanced, offering superior noise reduction and detail preservation, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of information on OIS and sensor sizes makes a definitive judgment impossible, but Sony’s brand reputation suggests a more sophisticated camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Sony Xperia 1 VII leverages the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite, featuring Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture, designed by Qualcomm, promises significant performance gains over the Motorola’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. The 8s Gen 3, while powerful with its Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.0 GHz, is built on a 4nm process, while the 8 Elite utilizes a more efficient 3nm process. This translates to better thermal management and sustained performance under heavy loads for the Sony. The Xperia 1 VII’s CPU configuration (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz) suggests a stronger focus on multi-core performance, benefiting demanding tasks like video editing.
Battery Life
The Sony Xperia 1 VII dominates in battery endurance. Its active use score of 15:32h significantly surpasses the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra’s 12:56h. This difference is likely due to the more efficient 3nm Snapdragon 8 Elite and optimized power management. While the Motorola compensates with incredibly fast 125W wired charging, allowing for a quick top-up, the Sony’s longevity reduces the need for frequent charging. The Xperia 1 VII also offers 30W wired charging with PD3.0 and PPS, reaching 50% in 30 minutes, and 15W wireless charging. The Motorola adds 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless, offering more versatility, but the Sony’s overall endurance is a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you need blazing-fast charging, a vibrant display, and don't mind a slightly less polished software experience. It's ideal for power users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the Sony Xperia 1 VII if you prioritize exceptional battery life, a premium build, and a creator-focused feature set, and are willing to pay a premium for a more refined, long-lasting experience.