Motorola Edge 50 Ultra vs. Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw speed and charging convenience, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset and 125W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 8 Pro. However, the Pixel 8 Pro’s superior camera processing and AI capabilities make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 50 Ultra | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 16 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 15 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), wooden back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.1 x 72.4 x 8.6 mm (6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 197 g (6.95 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~92.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 2500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 735 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.4, 72mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.9, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, HDR | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 Gen2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Forest Grey, Nordic Wood, Peach Fuzz | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | - | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | $ 939.00 / C$ 1,299.00 / £ 490.00 / € 609.90 / ₹ 59,999 | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra
- Significantly faster 125W charging
- Potentially better GPU performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Longer active use battery life (12:56h)
- Camera performance likely trails the Pixel 8 Pro
- Software support may not match Google’s commitment
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and AI features
- Seamless Google software experience and long-term updates
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Less powerful GPU compared to Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Shorter active use battery life (11:14h)
Display Comparison
Both devices feature 4nm chipsets, but their displays differ significantly. The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a higher peak brightness of 1600 nits compared to the Edge 50 Ultra’s 1473 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the difference isn’t massive, it’s noticeable. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display technology is likely LTPO, enabling variable refresh rates for improved efficiency, a feature not explicitly stated for the Edge 50 Ultra. This could translate to better battery life during static content viewing. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display is also known for its color accuracy, a key consideration for content creators.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess. While specific sensor details aren’t provided in the context data, Google’s image processing algorithms consistently deliver exceptional results, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 8 Pro’s camera excels in both photo and video capture, leveraging AI to enhance image quality and stabilization. The Edge 50 Ultra’s camera capabilities are less defined, but a focus on hardware specifications suggests a potential emphasis on sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS). Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to definitively assess its image quality compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s AI-driven approach. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also likely superior due to its advanced stabilization and processing.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra leverages the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, an octa-core processor with a prime Cortex-X4 core clocked at 3.0 GHz. This contrasts with the Google Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3, a nona-core chip featuring a Cortex-X3 core also at 3.0 GHz. While clock speeds are similar, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 generally offers superior GPU performance, making the Edge 50 Ultra more suitable for demanding games. The Pixel 8 Pro’s Tensor G3 excels in AI and machine learning tasks, powering features like Magic Eraser and real-time translation. The Edge 50 Ultra’s chipset is built on a 4nm process, potentially offering better thermal efficiency than the Tensor G3, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Pixel 8 Pro’s performance is heavily reliant on software optimization, while the Edge 50 Ultra leans towards brute force.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra achieves an impressive 12:56h active use score, slightly exceeding the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h. However, the charging speeds are where the Edge 50 Ultra truly shines. Its 125W wired charging is significantly faster than the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W charging, allowing for a full charge in a fraction of the time. The Edge 50 Ultra also supports 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, further enhancing its convenience. The Pixel 8 Pro offers 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, along with 'bypass charging' which minimizes battery degradation during charging. While the Pixel 8 Pro’s older endurance rating of 90h suggests good overall battery life, the Edge 50 Ultra’s faster charging is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra if you need a phone that prioritizes gaming, demanding applications, and incredibly fast charging – ideal for power users who dislike waiting. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, exceptional camera quality with advanced AI features, and long-term software support, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.