Motorola Edge 50 Neo vs. Nothing Phone (2a) Plus: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer active use score (16:34h vs 13:29h) and efficient chipset outweigh the Edge 50 Neo’s brighter display and faster wired charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 50 Neo | Nothing Phone (2a) Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 29 | 2024, July 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 29 | Available. Released 2024, August 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 154.1 x 71.2 x 8.1 mm (6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 in) | 161.7 x 76.3 x 8.5 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3, Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2670 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.4 inches, 97.5 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 107.5 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7350 Pro (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 5 major Android upgrades | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm | 50 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.76" |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes, 360˚ |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 15W wireless | 50W wired, 50% in 21 min, 100% in 56 min |
| Type | 4310 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nautical Blue, Latte, Grisaille, Poinciana, Mocha Mousse | Black, Grey |
| Models | XT2409-1 | A142P |
| Price | € 240.02 / $ 315.00 / £ 225.39 / ₹ 22,490 | € 269.90 / ₹ 22,599 |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 50:44h endurance, 1200 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- Faster 68W wired charging
- Wireless charging support
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
Nothing Phone (2a) Plus
- Superior battery life for all-day use
- More powerful Dimensity 7350 Pro chipset
- Efficient power management
- Lower peak display brightness
- Slower wired charging compared to Motorola
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1437 nits, compared to the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 1097 nits. This difference is noticeable in direct sunlight, making the Edge 50 Neo more readable outdoors. While both utilize OLED panels, the lack of LTPO technology in either phone means adaptive refresh rates aren’t as power-efficient as on flagship devices. The Edge 50 Neo’s higher brightness comes at the cost of potentially slightly reduced battery life, as maintaining that level requires more power. Color accuracy is likely similar, given both brands target a wide color gamut, but independent testing would be needed to confirm.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus may prioritize camera quality slightly more. Both phones likely feature a primary camera with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), crucial for sharp photos and stable videos. The aperture of the main lens will be a key differentiator; a wider aperture (lower f-number) allows more light, improving low-light performance. Ignoring the typical 2MP macro lenses found on both devices, the quality of the ultrawide and potentially a telephoto lens (if present) will be critical. Image processing algorithms will also play a significant role in the final image quality.
Performance
Both phones are powered by Mediatek Dimensity chips fabricated on a 4nm process, ensuring good efficiency. However, the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus utilizes the Dimensity 7350 Pro, featuring a faster CPU configuration with 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 cores versus the Edge 50 Neo’s 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to a performance edge for the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus in CPU-intensive tasks. The Edge 50 Neo’s GPU is likely comparable, but the 7350 Pro’s overall system-on-chip (SoC) efficiency contributes to its longer battery life. Both phones likely feature LPDDR5x RAM, but the specific speed and configuration could impact real-world performance.
Battery Life
The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus clearly wins in battery endurance. Its active use score of 16:34h significantly surpasses the Motorola Edge 50 Neo’s 13:29h. While the Edge 50 Neo offers faster 68W wired charging (and 15W wireless), the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus’s 50W charging still reaches 100% in a reasonable 56 minutes. The Edge 50 Neo’s battery endurance rating of 50:44h suggests a larger battery capacity, but the Dimensity 7350 Pro’s efficiency in the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus effectively offsets this, delivering superior real-world battery life. The Edge 50 Neo’s 1200 charge cycles suggest a focus on long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Neo if you need a brighter display for outdoor visibility and value the convenience of 68W wired and 15W wireless charging. Buy the Nothing Phone (2a) Plus if you prioritize maximizing battery life for heavy daily use, and appreciate a clean software experience with a focus on efficiency. The Nothing Phone (2a) Plus is the better choice for users who frequently travel or have limited access to power outlets.