Motorola Edge 40 vs Xiaomi Poco F5: The Ultimate Showdown

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders are battling for your attention: the Motorola Edge 40 and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both offer impressive features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Poco F5 edges out the Edge 40 thanks to its superior Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, slightly better battery life, and faster charging. While the Edge 40 boasts a brighter display, the Poco F5's performance and value proposition make it the winner for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Motorola Edge 40	Xiaomi Poco F5

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66
5G bands	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2023, May 04	2023, May 09
Status	Available. Released 2023, May 04	Available. Released 2023, May

Body
Build	Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame
Dimensions	158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in)	161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in)
SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz)	181 g (6.38 oz)
	IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	-	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak)	AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm)	Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPU	Mali-G77 MC9	Adreno 725
OS	Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades	Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM	256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Dual	50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF	-
Features	Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple	-	64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	-
Single	32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm	16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps	1080p@30/60fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	Yes
35mm jack	No	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers
	-	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.2, A2DP, LE	5.3, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	-	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS	GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
	Moto Ready For support	-

Battery
Charging	68W wired 15W wireless	67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min
Type	Li-Po 4400 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta	Black, Blue, White
Models	XT2303-2	23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I
Price	€ 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999	€ 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790
SAR	-	1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body)
SAR EU	-	0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	Endurance rating 98h	Endurance rating 118h
Camera	Photo / Video	Photo / Video
Display	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-24.2 LUFS (Very good)	-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
Performance	AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)	-

Motorola Edge 40

Brighter Display (1043 nits)
Clean Software Experience
Sleek Design
Wireless Charging

Less Powerful Chipset
Slower Charging
Potentially Less Battery Life

Xiaomi Poco F5

Powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 Chipset
Excellent Battery Life
Faster Charging (67W)
Competitive Price

Software Bloat (Potential)
Design Less Premium

Display Comparison

Both phones feature excellent OLED displays with infinite contrast ratios. The Motorola Edge 40 takes a slight lead with a peak brightness of 1043 nits, making it better suited for outdoor visibility. The Poco F5's 963 nits is still very respectable, offering vibrant colors and sharp details. Both have smooth 120Hz refresh rates.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones offering capable photo and video capabilities. The Edge 40 might have a slight edge in color accuracy, while the Poco F5 could offer slightly better low-light performance due to its more modern chipset. Detailed camera tests would be needed for a definitive conclusion.

Performance

Here's where the Poco F5 truly shines. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Mediatek Dimensity 8020. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Poco F5. The Edge 40 is still capable, but the Poco F5 offers a noticeable performance boost.

Battery Life

The Poco F5 demonstrates superior battery endurance. While the Edge 40 has an impressive endurance rating of 98h, the Poco F5 boasts an even higher rating of 118h and an active use score of 11:52h. Furthermore, the Poco F5's 67W charging is faster than the Edge 40's 68W wired charging and 15W wireless charging.

Buying Guide

The Motorola Edge 40 is ideal for users prioritizing a vibrant, high-brightness display and a clean software experience. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is a better choice for those seeking raw performance, longer battery life, and faster charging speeds, all while maintaining a competitive price.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?

The Xiaomi Poco F5, thanks to its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, offers significantly better gaming performance than the Motorola Edge 40.

❓ Is the Motorola Edge 40's software experience better?

Yes, the Motorola Edge 40 is known for its clean and near-stock Android experience, while the Poco F5's MIUI may include some pre-installed apps and customizations.