Motorola Edge 40 vs Realme 11 Pro+: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Realme 11 Pro+ takes the lead with its significantly faster 100W charging and longer battery life. However, the Edge 40 boasts a brighter display and a potentially more powerful chipset. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed and endurance versus display quality and raw performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 40 | Realme 11 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 04 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 04 | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Moto Ready For support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 15W wireless | 100W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | XT2303-2 | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 98h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Edge 40
- Brighter Display
- Potentially Faster Chipset
- Clean Software Experience
- Sleek Design
- Slower Charging
- Shorter Battery Life
- Camera may be less versatile
Realme 11 Pro+
- Incredibly Fast Charging (100W)
- Longer Battery Life
- Potentially More Versatile Camera
- Feature-Rich Software
- Dimmer Display
- Slightly Less Powerful Chipset
- Realme UI can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 shines with its impressive 1043 nits peak brightness, making it excellent for outdoor visibility. The Realme 11 Pro+’s 793 nits is still respectable, but noticeably dimmer. Both phones likely feature OLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks, but the Edge 40’s brightness advantage is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the Realme 11 Pro+ is expected to have a more versatile setup, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. The Edge 40's camera is likely good, but the Realme 11 Pro+ is anticipated to offer more advanced features and potentially better low-light performance. Specific camera specs are needed for a more accurate comparison.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40’s Dimensity 8020 generally offers slightly better raw performance than the Realme 11 Pro+'s Dimensity 7050. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming, the Edge 40 might provide a smoother experience in demanding applications. However, real-world performance differences may be minimal for most users.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+ clearly wins in the battery department, boasting an endurance rating of 112 hours compared to the Edge 40’s 98 hours. Coupled with its 100W charging, it can be fully charged in a fraction of the time it takes the Edge 40 (with its 68W wired and 15W wireless charging).
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 40 is ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant display, smooth performance for everyday tasks, and a clean software experience. The Realme 11 Pro+ is a better choice for those who value incredibly fast charging, extended battery life, and a feature-rich camera system.