Motorola Edge 40 vs Edge 40 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 40 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, vastly superior charging speeds, and a longer-lasting battery. However, the Edge 40 remains a strong contender, offering excellent value and a vibrant display for those prioritizing affordability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 40 | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 04 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 04 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Moto Ready For support | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 15W wireless | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4400 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | XT2303-2 | - |
| Price | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 98h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 40
- Excellent value
- Vibrant OLED display
- Stylish design
- Solid performance for everyday tasks
- Good camera
- Less powerful chipset than Pro
- Slower charging
- No reverse wireless charging
- Shorter battery life
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Blazing-fast 125W charging
- Longer battery life
- Superior camera performance
- Reverse wireless charging
- Higher price
- Design might be less distinctive than Edge 40
Display Comparison
Both phones feature stunning OLED displays with a 144Hz refresh rate and excellent color accuracy. The Edge 40 Pro edges ahead slightly with a marginally higher peak brightness (1050 nits vs 1043 nits), though the difference is barely noticeable in real-world use. Both offer infinite contrast ratios, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
While both offer capable camera systems, the Edge 40 Pro generally delivers superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Pro likely has a higher resolution main sensor and potentially improved image processing algorithms. Both phones record excellent video, but the Pro's processing might offer slightly better stabilization and dynamic range.
Performance
This is where the Edge 40 Pro truly shines. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a powerhouse, easily handling demanding games and multitasking with ease. The Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 is still capable, but it doesn't match the Pro's raw power and efficiency. Expect smoother performance and better thermal management on the Pro.
Battery Life
The Edge 40 Pro boasts a significantly larger battery and a much faster charging speed (125W wired vs 68W). The endurance rating of 117h versus 98h suggests a noticeably longer battery life on a single charge. The Pro also includes reverse wireless charging, a feature absent on the Edge 40.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 40 is ideal for users seeking a stylish, well-rounded phone with a great display and solid performance for everyday tasks. It's a fantastic choice for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is for power users, gamers, and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance, lightning-fast charging, and advanced camera capabilities.