Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs OnePlus 11: The Ultimate Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro takes the lead with its significantly brighter display and blazing-fast 125W charging. However, the OnePlus 11 offers a more refined software experience and potentially better camera tuning. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities: speed and brightness versus software polish and potentially superior image quality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 40 Pro | OnePlus 11 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 41, 40, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 04 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 04 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 163.1 x 74.1 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 2.92 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP64 | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1440 x 3216 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~525 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO3 Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 (International), ColorOS 14 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB only UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 48mm (telephoto), 1/2.74", PDAF, 2x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 115˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.0", AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, Auto HDR, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless | 100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 25 min - International 80W wired, PD - USA |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue | Titan Black, Eternal Green, Jupiter Rock |
| Models | - | PHB110, CPH2449, CPH2447, CPH2451 |
| Price | € 313.87 | $ 379.99 / ₹ 33,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1140661 (v9) GeekBench: 4899 (v5.1) GFXBench: 57fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Blazing-fast 125W charging
- Brighter display (1050 nits)
- Excellent endurance rating (117h)
- Clean Android experience
- Camera consistency may vary
- Brand recognition less than OnePlus
OnePlus 11
- Refined software experience (OxygenOS)
- Potentially more consistent camera
- Strong brand reputation
- Competitive charging speeds (100W/80W)
- Lower peak brightness (767 nits)
- Slightly lower endurance rating (108h)
- Software updates can be inconsistent
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro's display is a clear winner, boasting a measured peak brightness of 1050 nits compared to the OnePlus 11's 767 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Edge 40 Pro's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. Both utilize OLED technology for vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is subjective. Both phones feature capable camera systems, but the OnePlus 11 is generally known for its more consistent and refined image processing. The Edge 40 Pro's camera is also excellent, but may exhibit slightly more variance in image quality depending on the scene. Detailed camera tests are needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and effortless handling of demanding apps. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal, though Motorola's software might feel slightly more streamlined.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro demonstrates a superior endurance rating of 117h compared to the OnePlus 11's 108h. While both offer solid battery life, the Edge 40 Pro's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset contribute to its longer endurance. The Edge 40 Pro's 125W charging is significantly faster than the OnePlus 11's 100W (International) or 80W (USA) charging.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, a vibrant display, and a clean Android experience. The OnePlus 11 is a great choice for those who value a smooth software experience, a potentially more consistent camera, and a slightly more established brand reputation.