Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs. Moto X40: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro edges out the Moto X40 thanks to its superior display brightness, wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging capabilities. While both offer blazing-fast wired charging and the same core performance, the Edge 40 Pro provides a more complete premium experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 40 Pro | Motorola Moto X40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA 800 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 04 | 2022, December 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 04 | Available. Released 2022, December 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MYUI 6.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256GB/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 7 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue | Black, Blue |
| Models | - | XT2301-5 |
| Price | € 313.87 | About 540 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Brighter Display (1050 nits)
- Wireless Charging (15W)
- Reverse Wireless Charging (5W)
- Faster Wired Charging (125W)
- Excellent Endurance Rating (117h)
- Potentially Higher Price
- Camera details are limited
Motorola Moto X40
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Fast Wired Charging (125W)
- Potentially Lower Price
- Lower Estimated Display Brightness
- No Wireless Charging
- No Reverse Wireless Charging
- Battery life not explicitly stated
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, but the Edge 40 Pro boasts a significantly higher peak brightness of 1050 nits compared to the Moto X40 (estimated around 900 nits based on typical Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 implementations). This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. The Edge 40 Pro also has a reported contrast ratio of 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting excellent black levels and image quality. Both likely have 120Hz refresh rates for smooth scrolling.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided data. However, both phones are expected to offer competitive camera systems given the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2's image signal processor. We anticipate high-quality photos and videos in various lighting conditions. Further testing would be needed to determine which phone has the edge in image processing and overall camera performance. The Edge 40 Pro is likely to have a more advanced camera setup.
Performance
Powered by the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and CPU configuration, both phones deliver exceptional performance. Expect seamless multitasking, demanding gaming, and smooth app navigation. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal unless specific software optimizations favor one device over the other.
Battery Life
The Edge 40 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 117h. While this is a standardized test, it suggests excellent battery life. The Moto X40's battery life is not explicitly stated, but given the similar chipset and battery capacity (likely around 4600-5000mAh for both), it should still offer solid all-day battery life. The Edge 40 Pro's faster charging (125W wired) is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant, bright display, wireless charging convenience, and reverse wireless charging for accessories. The Moto X40 is a great choice for those seeking top-tier performance at a potentially slightly lower price point, and are less concerned with wireless charging features.