Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs. Edge 40: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 40 Pro is the clear winner for power users, boasting a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and significantly faster charging. However, the Edge 40 offers a more streamlined experience and a slightly more compact design, making it a compelling choice for those prioritizing portability and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 40 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 04 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 04 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | - | XT2303-2 |
| Price | € 313.87 | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Incredibly fast 125W charging
- Excellent display with high brightness
- Slightly better camera performance
- Premium build quality
- Potentially higher price
- Slightly larger and heavier
- Software updates can be inconsistent
Motorola Edge 40
- More affordable
- Sleek and compact design
- Vibrant OLED display
- Solid battery life
- Good value for money
- Dimensity 8020 chipset is less powerful
- Slower charging speeds
- Camera performance not as strong as the Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant OLED displays with a 144Hz refresh rate and impressive peak brightness (1050 nits for the Pro, 1043 nits for the Edge 40). The Edge 40 Pro might offer slightly better color accuracy due to its higher-end chipset, but the difference is likely minimal for most users. Both have excellent contrast ratios.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Edge 40 Pro generally delivers better image quality, especially in low light. The Pro likely has a more advanced image processing pipeline thanks to its more powerful chipset. Both phones offer versatile camera setups with ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
The Edge 40 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a significant leap over the Edge 40's Dimensity 8020. Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the Pro. The Pro also handles demanding tasks like video editing with ease.
Battery Life
The Edge 40 Pro holds a slight edge in battery life, with an endurance rating of 117h compared to the Edge 40's 98h. However, the Edge 40 Pro's 125W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Edge 40's 68W charging is still respectable, but considerably slower.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro? Power users, gamers, and anyone needing top-tier performance and blazing-fast charging. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 40? Users seeking a stylish, capable phone with a great display and solid battery life, without breaking the bank.