Motorola Edge 40 Pro vs Edge 30 Fusion: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, a brighter display, and much faster charging. While the Edge 30 Fusion remains a solid choice, the Pro's upgrades justify its likely higher price point for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 40 Pro | Motorola Edge 30 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - PRC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 04 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 04 | Available. Released 2022, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) | 158.5 x 72 x 7.5 mm or 7.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 168 g / 175 g (5.93 oz) |
| IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.99 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888+ 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For 3.5 support | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless | 68W wired, 50% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4600 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue | Neptune Blue, Cosmic Grey, Solar Gold, Aurora White, Viva Magenta |
| Models | - | XT2243-1 |
| Price | € 313.87 | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 117h | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 827929 (v9) GeekBench: 3458 (v5.1) GFXBench: 62fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2)
- Brighter display (1050 nits)
- Incredibly fast 125W charging
- Likely improved camera system
- Premium build quality (likely glass and metal)
- Likely higher price
- Potential for overheating under sustained load (common with powerful chips)
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
- More affordable
- Stylish design
- Decent camera for the price
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Slower performance (Snapdragon 888+)
- Less bright display (946 nits)
- Slower charging (68W)
- Likely less premium build materials
Display Comparison
The Edge 40 Pro takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 1050 nits compared to the Edge 30 Fusion's 946 nits. Both offer excellent contrast ratios (infinite nominal), but the Pro's higher brightness will be noticeable in direct sunlight. Both likely use OLED panels with vibrant colors and smooth refresh rates (likely 144Hz on the Pro and 120Hz on the Fusion).
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the Edge 40 Pro is expected to have a more advanced camera setup, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. Low-light performance and video recording quality are also likely to be better on the Pro. Both likely include ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
Here's where the Edge 40 Pro truly shines. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Edge 30 Fusion's Snapdragon 888+. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the Pro. The Pro's CPU architecture also offers improved efficiency.
Battery Life
The Edge 40 Pro holds a slight edge in battery life, with an endurance rating of 117h compared to the Edge 30 Fusion's 101h. However, the Edge 40 Pro's 125W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging speeds (50% in 6 minutes, 100% in 23 minutes). The Fusion's 68W charging is still fast, but not as impressive.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is ideal for power users, gamers, and anyone who prioritizes performance and fast charging. The Edge 30 Fusion is a great option for budget-conscious buyers who still want a stylish phone with a decent camera and reliable performance for everyday tasks.