Motorola Edge 30 vs. Moto G73: A Head-to-Head Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 30 offers a slightly more premium experience with a faster chipset and smoother display. However, the Moto G73 provides excellent value with a vibrant display and capable camera, making it a strong contender for budget-minded buyers. The Edge 30 wins on performance, but the G73 offers better value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 | Motorola Moto G73 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 27 | 2023, January 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 12 | Available. Released 2023, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 74.2 x 6.8 mm (6.28 x 2.92 x 0.27 in) | 161.4 x 73.8 x 8.3 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | Water-resistant design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteor Grey, Supermoon Silver, Aurora Green | Lucent White, Midnight Blue |
| Models | XT2203-1 | - |
| Price | $ 529.00 / € 168.00 | About 190 EUR |
Motorola Edge 30
- Faster Processor (Snapdragon 778G+)
- 144Hz Display
- Slightly Better Camera
- Premium Build Quality
- Higher Price
- No expandable storage
- Can get warm under heavy load
Motorola Moto G73
- Excellent Value for Money
- Vibrant 120Hz OLED Display
- Good Camera Performance
- Expandable Storage
- Slower Processor (Dimensity 930)
- Slightly Slower Charging
- Less Premium Build
Display Comparison
Both phones feature OLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Edge 30 boasts a 144Hz refresh rate, providing a noticeably smoother scrolling and gaming experience compared to the G73's 120Hz. The Edge 30 also has a slightly smaller size, which some may prefer for one-handed use.
Camera Comparison
The Edge 30 generally offers slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions, thanks to its image processing capabilities. Both phones feature capable main sensors, but the Edge 30's processing often results in more detailed and vibrant photos. The G73's camera is still very good for the price.
Performance
The Snapdragon 778G+ in the Edge 30 holds a clear advantage over the Dimensity 930 in the Moto G73. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games on the Edge 30. While the G73 is capable, it won't handle intensive tasks as effortlessly.
Battery Life
Battery life is comparable between the two devices. Both offer all-day battery life with moderate usage. The Edge 30's 33W charging is slightly faster than the G73's 30W charging, but the difference isn't substantial.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 30 is ideal for users who prioritize performance, a smoother display, and a more premium feel. It's a good choice for those who enjoy gaming or multitasking. The Moto G73 is perfect for users seeking a great all-around phone with a vibrant display and solid camera capabilities without breaking the bank.