Motorola Edge 30 vs Edge 40: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 40 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and generally improved performance. While the Edge 30 remains a solid choice, the Edge 40's upgrades justify its price premium for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 | Motorola Edge 40 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 41, 42, 43, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 27 | 2023, May 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 12 | Available. Released 2023, May 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, aluminum frame, plastic back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 74.2 x 6.8 mm (6.28 x 2.92 x 0.27 in) | 158.4 x 72 x 7.6 mm (6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 167 g or 171 g (5.89 oz) |
| Water-repellent design | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ | P-OLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.4, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR10, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Moto Ready For support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Meteor Grey, Supermoon Silver, Aurora Green | Nebula Green, Lunar Blue, Eclipse Black, Viva Magenta |
| Models | XT2203-1 | XT2303-2 |
| Price | $ 529.00 / € 168.00 | € 202.03 / $ 419.99 / £ 199.00 / ₹ 29,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 688347 (v9) GeekBench: 3320 (v5.1), 3603 (v6) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30
- Compact and lightweight design
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Good value for money
- Slower charging speed
- Less bright display
- Older chipset
Motorola Edge 40
- Faster charging (wired & wireless)
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More powerful chipset
- Sleek design
- Potentially higher price
- May be slightly larger than Edge 30
Display Comparison
The Edge 40 boasts a substantial advantage with its 1043 nits peak brightness, making it significantly easier to view outdoors. Its 'Infinite' contrast ratio (though nominal) suggests excellent image quality. The Edge 30's display is still good, but lacks the same punch and visibility in bright sunlight. Both feature OLED panels with smooth refresh rates.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable cameras, the Edge 40 likely has a slight edge in image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. Details on specific camera specs are limited, but the Dimensity 8020's image signal processor (ISP) generally provides better processing capabilities. Both offer standard photo and video modes.
Performance
The Edge 40's Dimensity 8020 chipset offers a noticeable performance boost over the Edge 30's Snapdragon 778G+. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Edge 40. Both phones handle everyday tasks with ease, but the Edge 40 shines under heavier workloads.
Battery Life
Both phones claim an impressive endurance rating of 98 hours. However, the Edge 40's 68W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the Edge 30's 33W charging. The addition of 15W wireless charging on the Edge 40 further enhances its convenience.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Motorola Edge 30? It's ideal for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize a compact design and smooth performance for everyday tasks. Who should buy the Motorola Edge 40? It's perfect for users who want a vibrant display, faster charging, and a more powerful chipset for demanding apps and gaming.