Motorola Edge 30 Ultra vs Edge 40 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Edge 40 Pro emerges as the clear winner, boasting a newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset, improved battery life, and faster charging. While the 30 Ultra has a slightly brighter display, the 40 Pro's overall enhancements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 Ultra | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 08 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 08 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 73.5 x 8.4 mm (6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 198.5 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1250 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/320/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - PRC | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Ready For support | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 125W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4610 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Interstellar Black, Starlight White | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | XT-2201 | - |
| Price | € 238.91 | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 92h | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -23.4 LUFS (Very good) | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 1074722 (v9) GeekBench: 4265 (v5.1) GFXBench: 73fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
- Very bright display
- High-resolution 200MP camera
- Fast 125W wired charging
- Sleek design
- Older chipset
- Shorter battery life
- Less refined image processing
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Newer Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Longer battery life
- Faster charging (PD3.0, QC5)
- Improved image processing
- Sleeker design
- Slightly lower peak brightness than 30 Ultra
- Higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature stunning OLED displays with a 144Hz refresh rate and excellent color accuracy. The Edge 30 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1047 nits, slightly edging out the Edge 40 Pro's 1050 nits. However, the difference is negligible in real-world usage. Both offer infinite contrast ratios, providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Edge 40 Pro's display also benefits from a slightly more refined color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature versatile camera systems. The Edge 30 Ultra has a 200MP main sensor, which allows for incredible detail in well-lit conditions. The Edge 40 Pro utilizes a 50MP main sensor with OIS. While the 30 Ultra's high-resolution sensor can capture impressive detail, the 40 Pro's image processing and OIS often result in more consistent and pleasing results, especially in low light. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both devices.
Performance
The Edge 40 Pro's Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a significant upgrade over the Edge 30 Ultra's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. The Gen 2 offers noticeably faster processing speeds, improved efficiency, and better graphics performance. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Edge 40 Pro. The 30 Ultra is still capable, but the 40 Pro takes the performance crown.
Battery Life
The Edge 40 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving an endurance rating of 117 hours compared to the Edge 30 Ultra's 92 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage times between charges. The Edge 40 Pro also supports faster 125W wired charging and includes PD3.0 and QC5 compatibility, alongside a much faster 50% charge time (6 minutes) and 100% charge time (23 minutes). The 30 Ultra's 125W charging is still fast, but the 40 Pro's overall charging experience is superior.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra is a good option for users prioritizing a very bright display and who might find a slightly lower price appealing. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is ideal for those seeking top-tier performance, longer battery life, and faster charging speeds, justifying the higher price tag.