Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy A34: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A34 takes the crown thanks to its significantly better battery life and more versatile camera system. While the Edge 30 Neo boasts faster charging and a slightly brighter display, the A34's overall package offers more value and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 Neo | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 08 | 2023, March 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 07 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) | 161.3 x 78.1 x 8.2 mm (6.35 x 3.07 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 5W wireless | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam | Lime, Graphite, Violet, Silver |
| Models | XT2245-1 | SM-A346E, SM-A346B, SM-A346B/DS, SM-A346B/DSN, SM-A346E/DS, SM-A346E/DSN, SM-A346M, SM-A346M/N, SM-A346M/DSN, SM-A3460 |
| Price | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 | € 169.99 / $ 175.00 / £ 164.99 / ₹ 23,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 104h | Endurance rating 133h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.4 LUFS (Good) | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 472126 (v9) GeekBench: 2316 (v5.5), 2518 (v6) GFXBench: 23fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Faster 68W wired charging
- Slightly brighter display
- Compact and lightweight design
- Stylish design
- Weaker performance than A34
- Shorter battery life
- Less versatile camera system
- Potentially less software support
Samsung Galaxy A34
- Excellent battery life
- More powerful processor
- Versatile camera system
- Samsung's software support and updates
- Water and dust resistance (IP67)
- Slower 25W charging
- Larger and heavier than Edge 30 Neo
- Design may be considered less exciting
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent brightness (Edge 30 Neo: 1004 nits, Galaxy A34: 1009 nits). The Edge 30 Neo has a slightly higher peak brightness, but the difference is negligible in real-world use. Both have 'Infinite' contrast ratios, a nominal term. The Galaxy A34's display is likely to be slightly more color accurate due to Samsung's display tuning.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy A34's camera system is more versatile, likely offering better low-light performance and more consistent results. While the Edge 30 Neo's camera is decent, the A34's image processing and additional features give it an edge. Expect better video recording capabilities on the A34 as well.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A34's Dimensity 1080 chipset generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Edge 30 Neo. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks, the A34 offers smoother multitasking and better performance in demanding games. The Cortex-A78 cores in the A34 contribute to its improved performance.
Battery Life
The Galaxy A34's battery life is a clear winner, boasting an endurance rating of 133 hours compared to the Edge 30 Neo's 104 hours. This translates to significantly longer usage between charges, making the A34 a more practical choice for heavy users.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a vibrant display for media consumption. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a better choice for those seeking long-lasting battery life, a more reliable camera, and the assurance of Samsung's software support.