Motorola Edge 30 Neo vs. Moto G72: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Moto G72 edges out the Edge 30 Neo thanks to its significantly longer battery life and slower charging. While the Edge 30 Neo boasts a slightly brighter display and faster charging speeds, the G72's overall value and endurance make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Motorola Edge 30 Neo | Motorola Moto G72 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 08 | 2022, September 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 07 | Available. Released 2022, October 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.4 x 7.9 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 155 g (5.47 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Splash and dust resistant | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | P-OLED, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 68W wired 5W wireless | 33W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4020 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam | Meteorite Gray, Polar Blue, Mineral White |
| Models | XT2245-1 | XT2255-1 |
| Price | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 | About 150 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 104h | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.4 LUFS (Good) | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 383317 (v9) GeekBench: 1842 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Slightly brighter display
- Faster 68W wired charging
- More premium design (subjective)
- 5G Connectivity
- Shorter battery life
- Slightly slower performance than G72
- Charging speed not as impressive as some competitors
Motorola Moto G72
- Exceptional battery life
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Competitive price
- Good display quality
- Slower 33W charging
- Less premium design
- Camera performance slightly behind the Edge 30 Neo in some scenarios
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with excellent brightness, with the Moto G72 slightly edging out the Edge 30 Neo at 1015 nits versus 1004 nits. Both have a nominal infinite contrast ratio. The Edge 30 Neo might offer slightly more accurate color reproduction, but the difference is minimal. Both displays are perfectly adequate for everyday use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is comparable between the two. Both offer decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but struggle a bit in low light. The Edge 30 Neo might have a slight edge in video recording due to the Snapdragon chipset's image processing capabilities, but the difference is not substantial. Both phones offer a versatile camera setup for casual photography.
Performance
The Moto G72's Mediatek Helio G99 offers a surprisingly capable performance, handling everyday tasks and moderate gaming with ease. The Edge 30 Neo's Snapdragon 695 5G is also competent, but the G99 generally provides a smoother experience, especially in graphically intensive applications. However, neither phone is a powerhouse for demanding games at maximum settings.
Battery Life
This is where the Moto G72 truly shines. Its endurance rating of 121 hours significantly surpasses the Edge 30 Neo's 104 hours. While the Edge 30 Neo offers faster 68W wired charging, the G72's larger battery capacity and efficient chipset result in significantly longer battery life overall.
Buying Guide
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is ideal for users who prioritize a vibrant display, faster charging, and a slightly more premium design. The Moto G72 is a better fit for those seeking exceptional battery life, a smooth user experience, and a more budget-friendly option.